BLOG

The Complete Guide to Building a DevOps Service Catalog

clock
8
min read
Doren Darmon
Head of Customer Experience
copy
Copy link

Engineering teams struggle with fragmented access requests and approvals across Slack and Jira, causing delays and inefficiency. A DevOps service catalog centralizes services with clear ownership, dependencies, and documentation—transforming tribal knowledge into self-service capabilities that reduce MTTR.

This approach standardizes workflows, automates provisioning, and establishes clear ownership. Engineers gain self-service tools, incident commanders access dependencies instantly, and compliance remains intact without slowing delivery. 

The seven-step framework below creates a sustainable service catalog that engineering teams readily adopt.

Step 1: Audit Your Engineering Requests

Slack pings about database restarts, Jira tickets for access, and incident notes on "missing dashboards" all point to the same bottleneck—repeat work that dilutes your team's velocity. 

  1. Surface the high-volume, high-friction requests to convert them into catalog items and cut average handling time by double-digit percentages.
  2. Export the past 90 days of Slack, Jira, and post-incident data. Aggregate, then classify each entry by request type, environment, urgency, and effort. Scattered records across multiple tools are inevitable—a disciplined audit reconciles them into a single truth set.
  3. Inspect content patterns next. Search Slack for verbs like provision, grant, deploy. In Jira, sort by label or component to identify "frequent flyers." For postmortems, tag any delay that lists "waiting on X" as a potential service candidate. Quantify frequency (requests per week) and friction (average resolution hours) to rank importance.
  4. Consider what engineers typically ask your team for in Slack, which Jira issues recur more than twice a sprint, what incident reviews flagged as delayed or manual, and where approvals or provisioning consistently stall. Document these patterns to build your baseline.

Sample findings often look like this:

Service Name Request Type Source Owner
Provision Kubernetes NS Infrastructure Slack SRE
Add GitHub Collaborator Access & Identity Jira DevOps
Restart Production Database Incident Action PagerDuty Postmortem

Prioritise candidates that appear weekly and demand manual intervention—these consume the most engineer time and yield the fastest ROI once automated. Defer niche or one-off requests until the core catalog is live.

Inline CTA: Need help classifying your service request chaos? Download the “Engineering Request Audit Template” to organize, rank, and score every repeat request.

Step 2: Define and Group Your Services

Transforming your scattered service requests into an organized catalog requires structured classification and thorough documentation. This systematic approach ensures engineers can quickly find and use services while maintaining clear ownership and accountability throughout your organization.

  1. Define service categories and taxonomy. Group services by platform area (Kubernetes, data, CI/CD), by owning squad, or by request frequency. Maintain consistency in your chosen taxonomy so engineers can predict where to look.
  2. Document the four essential components for each service: purpose, required inputs, expected outputs, and upstream/downstream dependencies. Including dependencies prevents the "why did my change break payments?" surprise later.
  3. Establish clear ownership for each service. Attach a Slack channel, on-call rota, and escalation path to every entry. Clear ownership reduces mean time to resolution and aligns with modern service catalog best practices.
  4. Assign baseline service-level agreements when adding services to the catalog. Implement a two-tier SLA: one hour for urgent incidents, 24 hours for routine work. Fast, uniform SLAs provide requesters confidence without burdening teams with bespoke targets.
  5. Structure catalog items consistently. Each item should include: intuitive category grouping, named service owner with contact channel, SLA targets (1h urgent/24h routine), and documentation covering inputs, outputs, dependencies, and runtime environment.
  6. Create a "DevOps Service Catalog Planning Sheet" with columns for Service Name, Category, Owner, SLA, Inputs, Outputs, Dependencies, Runtime, and Documentation URL. These fields map directly to automation rules and CI/CD integrations.
  7. Implement controlled vocabularies using drop-downs wherever possible. This standardization ensures metadata drives automation effectively. Include extensible fields to accommodate compliance status or business impact ratings as your program matures.

Standardized descriptions deliver measurable benefits: APIs read the same fields your engineers write, keeping the catalog current without manual maintenance. When every service shares a schema, routing rules, approval workflows, and analytics become configuration, not custom development work.

Looking for a ready-to-use schema? Grab the “DevOps Service Catalog Planning Sheet”—a downloadable spreadsheet that includes ownership, SLAs, inputs/outputs, dependencies, and more.

Step 3: Build Intake Forms That Don't Suck

Blocked engineers need request resolution, not form completion marathons. Design intake forms to capture automation triggers in under 60 seconds. Dynamic forms achieve this speed by displaying context-relevant fields based on requester identity, request type, and target environment. This approach eliminates static, universal templates that create friction in service catalogs.

Three design principles govern effective forms:

  • Limit cognitive load through plain language, flat navigation, and maximum five visible fields
  • Standardize inputs with dropdowns, toggles, and radio buttons so routing engines parse intent without natural-language interpretation
  • Embed hidden metadata—request type, urgency classification, and cost centre tags—enabling downstream workflows to enforce approvals and budget controls automatically

To ensure you’re doing it right: 

  • Keep visible fields under five
  • Prefer dropdowns to free text with one optional comments box for nuance
  • Display only fields relevant to the selected service or environment
  • Auto-tag every submission with type and urgency for routing and SLA tracking

Use Siit's Dynamic Forms to auto-populate user identity, infer environment from branch naming, and route the request to the correct resolver group in less than 60 seconds. The feature annotates each submission with AI-generated labels, so you can skip manual triage entirely.

Tired of clunky intake forms no one wants to fill out? Check out how Siit’s Dynamic Forms auto-fill context from Slack and route requests without manual triage.

Step 4: Route Requests Automatically

Manual triage forces you to read every request, guess its context, and copy-paste it to the right queue. Automated routing eliminates that waste by analysing each request's attributes—tool, cost, environment, and requester role—and assigning it to the correct resolver group in seconds. 

Begin by codifying deterministic rules. "Production + deployment" always routes to the release manager, whereas "development + database" goes straight to the platform bot for self-service provisioning. You can also add a cost threshold so that any spend over USD 500 triggers finance review. The result is predictable, auditable request flow.

Attribute Combination Destination Queue
env=prod AND type=deployment Release Management
env=dev AND service=db Platform Automation Bot
role=intern AND access=request Security Team
cost>500 FinOps Review
severity=P1 OR MTTR>1h On-Call SRE Escalation

Escalation keeps the engine honest. Set a timer—if the assignee has not acknowledged a priority-1 incident within 60 minutes, the rule escalates it to the staff SRE and posts a Slack alert.

Siit's AI Triage takes this approach further by analyzing historical resolution patterns and semantic request content. The system identifies intent beyond simple attribute matching—recognizing when a "database question" actually requires backend infrastructure expertise, or when a "deployment issue" signals underlying network constraints. 

Step 5: Define Approval Workflows

Approval workflows safeguard production systems while delivering change requests within defined SLAs. Rule-based gates convert ad-hoc "LGTM" messages into auditable checkpoints that unblock engineers predictably.

Select an approval model per service type. Single approvers handle low-risk actions while multi-level chains protect sensitive infrastructure. Parallel approvals compress time when distinct roles—security and finance—must sign simultaneously. Map each service to a model and identify items for auto-approval based on documented policy controls.

Embed approvals within engineering workflows. Siit’s Rapid Approvals, for instance, surface inline Approve / Decline buttons in Slack or Microsoft Teams, eliminating context-switching. Status updates thread back to original requests so participants track progress without portal refreshes.

Request Type Approval Required Approver SLA
Production deployment Single Release manager 30 min
New cloud database Multi-level Team lead → FinOps 2 h
Sandbox environment Auto-approved Immediate
AWS spend > $5 000 Parallel Eng manager & Finance 4 h

Configure timeouts to prevent approval limbo. Escalate to the next authority tier or auto-rollback changes when SLA clocks expire. Notify approvers at submission and T-10 minutes. Additional pings add noise and erode compliance.

Step 6: Track SLA & Resolution Performance

Service catalogs without performance measurement become abandoned documentation repositories. Implement real-time tracking across four core timestamps to convert operational data into continuous improvement actions.

Instrument each service request with creation, first response, resolution, and final closure timestamps. From these events derive the DevOps "Four Keys" (deployment frequency, lead time, change failure rate, MTTR) recommended by DORA and Atlassian

Metric Target Suggested Tool
First-Response Time ≤ 15 min for P1, ≤ 1 h for P2 Slack and/or Teams bot + Siit Analytics
Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) ≤ 4 h for incidents Jira dashboard—integrate with Siit
SLA Compliance ≥ 95 % across all services Siit SLA tracker
Change Failure Rate ≤ 10 % of deployments CI/CD pipeline export to Grafana
User CSAT ≥ 4.5 / 5 Post-resolution survey in Siit

Calculate automation coverage as the ratio of requests closed without human intervention to total requests over the past 30 days. Run this calculation nightly and expose the figure on an "Automation Metrics Dashboard" alongside manual outliers to identify workflows ready for scripting.

Present quarterly to management using a single slide: metric, previous value, current value, delta, planned remediation. Stakeholders see an accountable, numbers-driven operation; practitioners gain a clear mandate to optimise.

Inline CTA: Time to benchmark your ops health? Download the “Automation Metrics Dashboard Template” and track SLA compliance, MTTR, and more—all in one page.

Step 7: Publish and Maintain Your Catalog

Successful service catalog deployment requires strategic implementation where engineers already work. Follow these five steps to ensure adoption and maintenance:

  1. Publish your catalog where engineers work daily—pin URLs in Slack channels, embed tabs in Microsoft Teams, and integrate links within CI/CD pipelines to establish it as the single source of truth.
  2. Integrate with existing documentation systems by embedding service pages in Confluence and mirroring metadata in Notion to prevent version conflicts and keep runbooks synchronized.
  3. Demonstrate time savings during sprint reviews by showcasing common workflows like database provisioning that bypass ad-hoc requests and route directly to automation.
  4. Review catalog content quarterly with service owners to maintain accuracy while implementing automated drift detection for runtime versions and deployment status.
  5. Collect systematic feedback through post-fulfillment surveys to track satisfaction and identify improvement opportunities for continuous refinement.

Ensure your catalog is:

  • Reviewed and signed off by all service owners
  • Linked in relevant Slack and Teams channels
  • Has quarterly accuracy audits scheduled
  • Has automated CI/CD syncs running nightly
  • Displays ownership and escalation paths on every service page

How to Launch a DevOps Catalog in Siit

Implement a DevOps service catalog in just five working days with Siit's platform to transform scattered communication into structured workflows. Follow these steps to achieve 90% auto-routing of requests with zero custom code:

  • Day 1: Configure Siit's Service Catalog builder. Import each high-volume service—provisioning, deployment, access management—then assign owners, SLAs, and dependencies. The interface mirrors industry-standard metadata schema, capturing ownership, runtime specifications, and documentation links in validated formats. Siit syncs changes through API calls rather than manual edits, ensuring governance consistency across automated catalogs.
  • Day 2: Deploy Dynamic Forms directly to Slack or Microsoft Teams. Each form renders fewer than five fields, auto-fills requester context, and hides irrelevant inputs through conditional logic. Production-level requests route to appropriate queues while eliminating repetitive data entry. 
  • Day 3: Configure AI Triage routing rules. Siit classifies intake by environment, cost impact, and urgency, then applies attribute-based routing. Critical production incidents reach on-call SRE channels within 60 seconds; non-urgent staging tasks flow to backlog queues. Escalation timers enforce predefined SLA targets automatically.
  • Day 4: Activate Rapid Approvals to eliminate manual bottlenecks. Approvers clear or reject requests inline within chat interfaces. Unresolved items escalate automatically after two hours, maintaining compliance without introducing additional tools.
  • Day 5: Observe analytics dashboard tracking. Monitor request volume, resolution time, and SLA attainment in real time—metrics essential for catalog health assessment. A single engineer with Slack admin rights, Jira API access, and Siit credentials can complete this end-to-end deployment. 

Sign up for Siit today and join hundreds of leading organizations that have cut MTTR while boosting developer productivity. Our 14-day free trial gives you full access to all features, dedicated onboarding support, and proven implementation templates. 

You can also schedule a personalized demo and see how your team can deploy a complete DevOps service catalog in less than a week.

It’s ITSM built for the way you work today.

Book a demo