Alternatives

Best Zapier Alternatives for 2026: Top 5 Tools Compared

Compare the best Zapier alternatives for IT teams. Explore Make, n8n, Power Automate, Workato, and Activepieces for workflow automation at scale.

Tools > Alternatives to trending tools >
Zapier

Best Zapier alternatives in 2026

Make

Best for:

visual automation workflows

Pros:

  • More cost-effective than Zapier for organizations with substantial automation needs
  • Excellent visual representation of complex workflows and data flow
  • Advanced features like iterators, filters, and aggregators for data processing
  • Strong community and marketplace of pre-built templates
  • Better handling of error scenarios and debugging capabilities

Cons:

  • Advanced visual workflow builder with rich data mapping capabilities
  • Superior cost efficiency compared to Zapier for high-volume usage
  • Better handling of complex conditional logic and branching scenarios
  • Strong data transformation and manipulation tools
  • More transparent pricing model based on operations rather than workflows

Relative cost:

$9+/user/month

Page Name
vs.
Make

Make

Pricing

n8n

Best for:

Pros:

Cons:

Relative cost:

Page Name
vs.
n8n

n8n

Pricing

Power Automate

Best for:

App-to-app automation

Pros:

  • Seamless integration with existing Microsoft investments
  • Enterprise-grade security and governance
  • RPA capabilities for legacy system automation
  • Familiar interface for Microsoft-trained administrators
  • Cost-effective for organizations with existing Microsoft licensing

Cons:

  • Complex licensing structure — Confusing per-user vs. per-flow plans, premium connector fees, and throttling caps; difficult to control costs when multiple employees create workflows
  • Limited non-Microsoft integrations — Works best within Microsoft ecosystem; premium connectors required for most third-party apps; free plan restricts to Microsoft apps only
  • Steep learning curve for complex workflows — Simple flows are easy, but advanced scenarios require knowledge of Workflow Definition Language and JSON; vague error messages make debugging difficult

Relative cost:

From $15/user/month

Page Name
vs.
Power Automate

Power Automate

Pricing

Workato

Best for:

App-to-app automation

Pros:

  • Enterprise-scale automation with unlimited workflows on platform licenses
  • Advanced security and compliance features
  • Strong integration with enterprise systems (SAP, Workday)
  • Comprehensive audit trails and governance controls
  • Professional services and support for complex implementations

Cons:

  • Expensive task-based pricing — Costs scale based on number of tasks; can become prohibitively expensive for high-volume automations and small businesses
  • Steep learning curve — Complex setup for custom connectors and advanced configurations; mastering recipes and features requires significant time investment
  • Limited debugging and error visibility — No proper debugging features with breakpoints; limited log visibility requires contacting support to troubleshoot issues
  • Data and feature limitations — Lacks loops, has timeout issues, limited Excel support, CSV exports capped at 1,000 rows; ETL/ELT weak for complex transformations
  • Relative cost:

    Custom enterprise pricing

    Page Name
    vs.
    Workato

    Workato

    Pricing

    Activepieces

    Best for:

    App-to-app automation

    Pros:

    • Predictable pricing regardless of workflow execution volume
    • Open-source flexibility and customization options
    • No vendor lock-in with self-hosting capabilities
    • Growing library of pre-built connectors and templates
    • Cost-effective for high-volume automation scenarios

    Cons:

  • Limited integrations — Around 200–330 connectors compared to Zapier's 5,000+; some pieces missing functionality for specific third-party services
  • Steep learning curve — Requires training and better documentation to effectively use; initial setup can be complex and time-consuming
  • Younger platform with fewer features — Newer project lacks polish and advanced features of established competitors; limited enterprise-grade support for larger organizations
  • Limited customer support — Users report difficulty contacting support; few communication channels available outside of sales
  • Relative cost:

    10 free flows, then $5/flow/month

    Page Name
    vs.
    Activepieces

    Activepieces

    Pricing

    Notion has become a popular all-in-one workspace combining notes, databases, tasks, and wiki functionality. But many teams seek alternatives due to performance bottlenecks with large databases, steep learning curves for non-technical users, limited project management depth, or pricing concerns as AI features get bundled into higher tiers.

    Whether you're hitting Notion's scaling limits or need something more specialized for your workflow, several strong alternatives offer different approaches.

    Here's what to consider when evaluating your options.

    Top Alternatives to Notion

    These five platforms offer distinct advantages depending on your priorities and use case.

    Category Coda ClickUp Slite Microsoft Loop Obsidian
    Pricing Doc-maker pricing model $7-19/user/month ~20% cheaper than Notion Business Included in M365 plans Free (optional paid sync)
    Best For Logic-heavy workflows Project-first teams Knowledge management Microsoft ecosystem Personal knowledge work
    Key Strength Advanced formulas & automation Comprehensive project management AI-powered search & verification Native M365 integration Local-first data control
    Enterprise Features Advanced permissions Workload views & dashboards Doc verification workflows Enterprise M365 controls Self-hosted options
    Free Tier Yes, with limitations Free Forever plan Limited free tier Via M365 subscriptions Core app is free

    Alternative #1—Coda

    Coda positions itself as the closest all-around Notion replacement, but with significantly more powerful formulas, automation, and database capabilities. It follows a "docs-as-apps" philosophy where documents can contain interactive tables, buttons, and complex logic.

    Teams choose Coda when they need Notion's flexibility but hit limitations with performance, automation, or data manipulation.

    What Does Coda Do

    Coda creates interactive documents that combine rich text, database-like tables, and spreadsheet-style formulas with automation capabilities. Teams use it for product roadmaps, OKR tracking, CRM systems, and project dashboards built within documents that can be shared and collaborated on.

    Coda Differentiators

    • Advanced formulas and cross-table logic far more powerful than Notion's formula system
    • Native automations and "Packs" with built-in integrations to Slack, Gmail, and Jira without external services
    • Doc-maker pricing model where only doc creators pay (viewers and editors can be free depending on plan)
    • Better suited for data-heavy workflows and complex calculations

    Coda Pros

    • Significantly more powerful for complex calculations and data manipulation
    • Native automations reduce dependence on tools like Zapier
    • Better suited for teams building internal tools and operational dashboards
    • Generally handles larger datasets more efficiently than Notion

    Coda Pricing

    • Free: Personal use with document size and feature limitations
    • Pro: $10/doc maker/month (billed annually) for small teams
    • Team: $30/doc maker/month (billed annually) with advanced features
    • Enterprise: Custom pricing with enhanced security and admin controls

    Alternative #2—ClickUp

    ClickUp markets itself as "one app to replace them all," offering project management, docs, goals, whiteboards, and collaboration features as core capabilities. Teams choose ClickUp when they need stronger project management than Notion provides, particularly for complex workflows with dependencies and time tracking.

    The platform is project-first, with documentation as a supporting feature rather than the other way around.

    What Does ClickUp Do

    ClickUp provides comprehensive project and work management with tasks, docs, goals, dashboards, and team collaboration features. It emphasizes visual project tracking through multiple views (lists, boards, Gantt, calendar) while incorporating document collaboration.

    ClickUp Differentiators

    • Project management-first approach with built-in sprints, dependencies, workload views, and time tracking
    • Multiple project views including native Gantt charts, Kanban boards, and calendar views
    • Resource management with team capacity planning and workload distribution tools
    • Strong automation capabilities with built-in workflow automation for project processes

    ClickUp Pros

    • Superior project management features compared to Notion's basic task capabilities
    • Better suited for teams running complex, interdependent projects
    • Strong reporting and analytics for project performance
    • Comprehensive all-in-one approach reduces tool switching

    How ClickUp Works with Siit

    ClickUp integrates with Siit to automate ticket creation and match records between platforms. When employees submit requests through Slack or Teams, Siit can automatically create corresponding ClickUp tasks with full context.

    Internal support teams manage requests in Siit's unified dashboard while project work stays organized in ClickUp. AI-powered workflows handle cross-departmental coordination that ClickUp wasn't designed for.

    ClickUp Pricing

    • Free Forever: Feature-rich free plan with unlimited tasks and core project management
    • Unlimited: $7/user/month (billed annually) with expanded storage and features
    • Business: $12/user/month with advanced features and integrations
    • Enterprise: $19/user/month with enhanced security and controls

    Alternative #3—Slite

    Slite focuses specifically on team knowledge management and documentation, positioning itself as a more structured and AI-enhanced alternative to Notion's wiki functionality. Teams choose Slite when they want dedicated knowledge management without the complexity and potential sprawl of Notion's flexible workspace model.

    It's opinionated about structure, which prevents the chaos that can emerge in flexible tools.

    What Does Slite Do

    Slite creates organized team knowledge bases with built-in AI search, document verification, and structured information architecture. It emphasizes keeping team knowledge current, discoverable, and trustworthy through automated maintenance suggestions.

    Slite Differentiators

    • AI-powered knowledge management with natural language search and answers from verified documents
    • Opinionated structure with built-in organization that prevents sprawl common in flexible tools
    • Document verification workflows to keep knowledge current and accurate
    • Simplified interface with lower learning curve compared to Notion's database complexity

    Slite Pros

    • Focuses specifically on knowledge management rather than trying to be everything
    • AI features designed specifically for team documentation and Q&A
    • Easier adoption for non-technical team members
    • Better governance for maintaining accurate, up-to-date information

    Slite Pricing

    • Free: Limited team size and features
    • Standard: $8/user/month for full team features
    • Premium: $12.50/user/month with advanced AI and analytics
    • Enterprise: Custom pricing with enhanced security and compliance

    Alternative #4—Microsoft Loop

    Microsoft Loop provides collaborative workspaces with live components that sync across Microsoft 365 applications. Teams in Microsoft-centric organizations choose Loop when they want Notion-like functionality while staying within their existing Microsoft ecosystem and security framework.

    It's not a standalone product; Loop is part of Microsoft 365 subscriptions.

    What Does Microsoft Loop Do

    Loop creates collaborative workspaces with reusable components (tasks, tables, notes) that stay synchronized wherever they're embedded across Microsoft 365 apps like Teams, Outlook, and Word. It enables real-time collaboration on shared content.

    Microsoft Loop Differentiators

    • Native Microsoft 365 integration with components that sync seamlessly across Teams, Outlook, Word, and other Office apps
    • Enterprise security and compliance inherited from existing Microsoft 365 governance policies
    • Live components across apps that appear and update in real-time across multiple Microsoft applications
    • Familiar Microsoft interface consistent with other Microsoft tools, reducing training needs

    Microsoft Loop Pros

    • Deep integration eliminates data silos for Microsoft-centric organizations
    • Leverages existing Microsoft 365 security and compliance frameworks
    • Familiar user experience for teams already using Microsoft tools
    • Real-time synchronization across the entire Microsoft productivity suite

    Microsoft Loop Pricing

    • Included in Microsoft 365 Business subscriptions ($6-22/user/month)
    • No standalone Loop options available; only accessible as part of qualifying Microsoft 365 subscriptions
    • Enterprise features scale with existing Microsoft 365 enterprise plans

    Alternative #5—Obsidian

    Obsidian offers a local-first approach to knowledge management with powerful linking, graph visualization, and plugin extensibility. Teams and individuals choose Obsidian when they want complete control over their data, offline capability, and highly customizable knowledge management without cloud dependencies.

    It's fundamentally different from cloud-first tools: your files live on your device in standard Markdown format.

    What Does Obsidian Do

    Obsidian creates networked knowledge bases using Markdown files stored locally on your device, with powerful bidirectional linking, graph visualization, and extensive customization through community plugins. It focuses on connection discovery and long-term knowledge building.

    Obsidian Differentiators

    • Local-first architecture with files stored on your device and optional cloud sync for collaboration
    • Powerful graph visualization showing visual representation of knowledge connections
    • Extensive plugin ecosystem with hundreds of community plugins for specialized functionality
    • Complete data ownership with files in standard Markdown format, avoiding vendor lock-in

    Obsidian Pros

    • Full control over data with no cloud dependencies required
    • Highly customizable through plugins and themes
    • Strong for building interconnected knowledge over time
    • Works completely offline when needed

    Obsidian Pricing

    • Free: Full desktop functionality for personal, commercial, and non-profit use
    • Catalyst: $25 one-time for early access to new features
    • Sync: $8/month for official cloud synchronization service
    • Publish: $16/month for web publishing capabilities

    How Siit Connects Your Project Management Tools

    These workspace platforms handle documentation, projects, and team collaboration. But the operational workflows that span IT, HR, Finance, and Operations typically require manual coordination across separate systems.

    Siit integrates with knowledge bases like Notion and Confluence, project tools like ClickUp and Asana, and communication platforms like Slack and Teams. When employees ask questions, Siit's AI assistant can search your knowledge base and suggest relevant pages automatically.

    With 50+ native integrations, Siit creates a unified operational layer that makes your workspace tools work better together. Your choice of documentation platform becomes less critical when AI-powered workflows handle the coordination between systems and departments.

    Rootly
    FireHydrant
    Grafana
    Datadog
    Ansible
    Chef
    Kubernetes
    OpenShift
    Kubernetes
    Docker Swarm
    Jenkins
    GitHub Actions
    Datadog
    Splunk
    Datadog
    New Relic
    Prometheus
    Grafana
    Notion
    Jira
    Ansible
    Puppet
    Docker
    Podman
    CyberArk
    Okta
    Microsoft Teams
    Google Meet
    Microsoft Teams
    Google Workspace​
    Rippling
    Deel
    Microsoft 365
    Google Workspace​
    Monday.com
    Asana
    Jira
    ClickUp
    Asana
    Notion
    Notion
    ClickUp
    Notion
    Monday.com
    Asana
    ClickUp
    Auth0
    Duo
    Linear App
    Jira
    Slack Software
    Discord
    BambooHR
    Deel
    Incident.io
    Rootly
    PagerDuty
    Incident.io
    Rippling
    BambooHR
    Duo
    Okta
    JumpCloud
    Okta
    Workday
    HiBob
    Zapier
    n8n
    Notion
    Jira
    Monday.com
    Jira
    Ping Identity
    Okta
    Notion
    Confluence
    ServiceNow
    Jira Service Management
    Monday.com
    Google Workspace​
    Auth0
    Okta
    Google Chat
    Slack Software
    Jira
    Confluence
    Asana
    Jira
    Monday.com
    Linear App
    Jamf MDM
    Kandji​
    Microsoft Entra ID
    Okta
    Zluri
    Torii
    Notion
    Slack Software
    Slack Software
    Microsoft Teams
    Asana
    Slack Software

    FAQs

    What makes a good Zapier alternative for growing teams?

    The best alternatives provide either significant cost savings at scale, advanced workflow capabilities Zapier lacks, or deployment flexibility like self-hosting. Look for transparent pricing, strong integration ecosystems, and the specific features your team needs, whether that's visual workflow design, enterprise governance, or open-source flexibility.

    How do I choose between visual builders like Make and code-first platforms like n8n?

    Consider your team's technical expertise and automation complexity needs. Make excels for business users who need sophisticated workflows with minimal coding. n8n is ideal for developer teams wanting full customization and integration control. If you need both, start with the tool that matches your primary users and add the other for specific use cases.

    Can I use multiple automation platforms together without creating chaos?

    Yes, but success requires clear boundaries. Assign each platform a specific role (Make for marketing workflows, n8n for data processing, Siit for employee-facing automation) and use integration tools or APIs to share data between them. The key is avoiding overlap and ensuring each tool serves a distinct purpose.

    Should I migrate completely away from Zapier or run tools in parallel?

    Many teams start by running new tools alongside Zapier, gradually migrating workflows based on specific needs. This approach lets you test alternatives without disrupting working automations. Complete migration makes sense when cost savings or feature requirements justify the effort, but parallel operation can be permanent if different tools serve different use cases well.

    How important are enterprise features when evaluating Zapier alternatives?

    Enterprise features become critical as teams scale beyond 100 employees or handle sensitive data. Look for role-based access controls, audit logging, SSO integration, and compliance certifications if your industry requires them. However, don't pay for enterprise complexity if your team primarily needs better cost efficiency or workflow capabilities.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.