Popular comparison

Ansible vs. Puppet: Which Is Right for Your Team?

Compare Ansible and Puppet features, pricing, and scalability. Find which configuration management tool fits your team's needs.

Tools > Popular comparison >
Ansible vs. Puppet

When evaluating configuration management tools, IT teams often find themselves choosing between Ansible's agentless simplicity and Puppet's enterprise-scale compliance capabilities. Both platforms automate infrastructure management, but they serve different organizational needs and deployment scenarios. Understanding their core differences helps teams select the tool that aligns with their scale, expertise, and operational priorities.

Ansible vs. Puppet at a glance

Here's how these leading configuration management platforms compare across key decision factors.

Feature Ansible Puppet
Purpose Agentless configuration management and orchestration Agent-based configuration management with continuous compliance
Best when you need Rapid deployment, multi-cloud automation, minimal learning curve Enterprise compliance, large-scale drift correction, and regulatory automation
Primary user(s) DevOps teams, solo IT managers, growing tech companies Enterprise IT teams, compliance-focused organizations, and regulated industries
Headline strength No agent installation required, YAML simplicity Continuous desired state enforcement, CIS Benchmarks automation
Limitation Performance degradation at 500+ nodes, Windows complexity Steep learning curve, "complexity paradox" for moderate tasks
Starting price Free (Open Source); Enterprise: $130/node/year (Standard, 100 nodes) Free (Open Source); Enterprise Standard/Premium: $120-$199/node/year
Signature integration Native cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP), ServiceNow 49+ operating systems, CIS Benchmarks, DISA STIGs

Overview of Ansible

Ansible is an agentless infrastructure automation platform that uses declarative YAML-based playbooks to manage configuration, application deployment, and orchestration across distributed infrastructure. Named a leader in Forrester's Infrastructure Automation Platforms Wave (Q4 2024), Ansible is the most widely adopted configuration management platform, holding more than double Puppet's market share.

The platform's defining characteristic is its agentless architecture, using SSH for Linux/Unix systems and WinRM for Windows, which eliminates the need to install and maintain proprietary agents across managed infrastructure. This push-based model enables immediate deployment and simplified orchestration workflows.

Key Features:

  • Agentless architecture with SSH/WinRM connectivity
  • YAML-based playbooks with human-readable syntax
  • Native multi-cloud support (AWS, Azure, GCP)
  • Configurable parallel execution with job slicing for horizontal scaling
  • Enterprise security integrations (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, CyberArk)
  • Network automation across multi-vendor infrastructure (Cisco, Juniper, F5)
  • Native CI/CD integration with GitOps workflows
  • Automation Controller with role-based access control

Ideal for: Organizations prioritizing rapid deployment, agentless management, and multi-cloud automation with teams seeking minimal learning curve and fast time-to-value.

Overview of Puppet

Puppet is an agent-based configuration management platform that uses a declarative domain-specific language to enforce desired infrastructure states continuously. Operating on a client-server architecture, Puppet excels at enterprise-scale compliance automation and regulatory enforcement across 49+ operating systems.

The platform's strength lies in its continuous configuration automation approach, where agents continuously monitor infrastructure against defined baselines and automatically remediate configuration drift. Puppet Enterprise provides policy-driven management with built-in CIS Benchmarks and DISA STIG compliance profiles, making it particularly valuable for regulated industries requiring automated security hardening.

Key Features:

  • Agent-based continuous desired state enforcement
  • Puppet Domain-Specific Language (DSL) for infrastructure as code
  • Support for 49+ operating systems and platforms
  • Built-in CIS Benchmarks and DISA STIG compliance automation
  • Puppet Forge with 6,000+ community modules
  • Advanced configuration drift detection and automated remediation
  • Enterprise reporting and analytics dashboards
  • ServiceNow CMDB integration for ITSM workflows

Ideal for: Enterprise organizations managing complex, large-scale infrastructure (1,000+ nodes) in regulated industries requiring continuous compliance automation and sophisticated configuration drift management.

Side-by-Side Feature Comparison

Feature Ansible Puppet
Architecture Agentless (SSH/WinRM) Agent-based client-server
Configuration Language YAML playbooks Puppet DSL
Deployment Model Push-based orchestration Pull-based continuous enforcement
Learning Curve weeks to proficiency months to productivity
Enterprise Scalability May require performance tuning beyond 500 nodes Optimized for 1,000+ nodes
Operating System Support Linux, Windows, Unix variants 49+ operating systems
Compliance Automation Manual policy implementation (no built-in CIS/DISA policy packs) Built-in CIS Benchmarks, DISA STIGs
Drift Detection Manual playbook execution Continuous automated monitoring
Windows Management Complex WinRM configuration Native cross-platform support
Community Resources Ansible Galaxy modules Puppet Forge (6,000+ modules)
Multi-Cloud Support Native AWS, Azure, GCP collections Cloud provider modules available
Enterprise Security HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager Role-based access control, audit trails

When to Choose Ansible vs. Puppet

Choose Ansible if you need:

  • Rapid deployment without agent installation overhead
  • Agentless management for environments where agent deployment is impractical
  • Multi-cloud orchestration with native cloud provider integrations
  • Minimal learning curve for teams new to configuration management
  • Fast time-to-value for deployments under 500 nodes
  • YAML-based simplicity for infrastructure as code
  • Network automation across heterogeneous infrastructure
  • GitOps workflows with native CI/CD integration

Choose Puppet if you value:

  • Continuous compliance monitoring with automated drift correction
  • Enterprise-scale performance for 1,000+ node deployments
  • Built-in regulatory compliance (CIS Benchmarks, DISA STIGs)
  • Mature cross-platform support across 49+ operating systems
  • Sophisticated configuration management with declarative DSL
  • Long-term infrastructure governance and audit capabilities
  • Established enterprise integrations with ITSM platforms
  • Dedicated platform teams with configuration management expertise

Both tools serve legitimate enterprise needs. Ansible optimizes for deployment speed and simplicity, while Puppet prioritizes long-term governance and compliance at scale.

How Siit Integrates With Both Tools

Ansible and Puppet handle what happens on your servers. Siit handles everything that happens before and after: the requests, approvals, and coordination across teams. When someone needs a configuration change, environment provisioning, or compliance review, Siit routes those requests through proper approval workflows in Slack or Microsoft Teams with full context from connected systems like Okta and Jamf.

Neither Ansible nor Puppet solves the coordination overhead that eats your day. Siit's AI agents automate the cross-departmental handoffs between IT, HR, and Finance so your team spends less time routing requests and more time running infrastructure.

Start your free trial with Siit and stop being the human API between departments.

FAQs

Can Ansible and Puppet be used together?

Yes, many organizations use hybrid approaches—Ansible for rapid deployment and initial provisioning, combined with Puppet for ongoing compliance and configuration drift management. This leverages Ansible's deployment speed with Puppet's continuous governance capabilities.

Which tool is better for teams new to configuration management?

Ansible typically offers a gentler learning curve with its YAML-based syntax and agentless architecture. Teams can achieve productivity in 2-4 weeks versus Puppet's 3-6 month learning investment, making Ansible more accessible for configuration management newcomers.

How do licensing costs compare at enterprise scale?

Ansible's enterprise costs scale with node count, starting at $13,000/year for 100 nodes. Puppet Enterprise pricing starts similarly at $120/node/year. Both can reach six figures at enterprise scale. Total cost of ownership should include training investment, professional services, and ongoing maintenance — areas where Puppet's complexity may require additional resources.

Which tool handles Windows management better?

Puppet provides superior native Windows support across its agent-based architecture, while Ansible requires complex WinRM configuration and dependency management that can introduce vulnerabilities and operational overhead in Windows-heavy environments.

What's the performance difference at large scale?

Puppet demonstrates superior performance at enterprise scale (5,000+ nodes) due to its pull-based agent architecture, enabling parallel updates. Ansible's default configuration may require performance tuning beyond 500 nodes, including adjustments to fork counts, SSH pipelining, and connection persistence. Puppet's pull-based agent architecture handles parallel updates natively, giving it an advantage at enterprise scale without additional optimization.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.