Popular comparison

Kubernetes vs. OpenShift: Which Is Right for Your Team?

Compare Kubernetes and OpenShift to find the right fit for your team, whether you need Kubernetes' vendor-neutral flexibility and cost efficiency or OpenShift's enterprise-ready integration and operational simplicity.

Tools > Popular comparison >
Kubernetes vs. OpenShift

IT leaders evaluating container orchestration platforms face a fundamental choice: build flexibility with Kubernetes' open-source ecosystem or buy enterprise-ready simplicity with Red Hat OpenShift. While both platforms handle container orchestration, they represent different philosophies. Kubernetes offers maximum customization at the cost of operational complexity, while OpenShift provides pre-integrated enterprise capabilities with premium pricing. Understanding these trade-offs is key to making the right strategic decision for your organization.

Kubernetes vs. OpenShift at a glance

Here's how these container orchestration platforms compare across key evaluation criteria for enterprise IT teams.

Kubernetes vs OpenShift
Feature Kubernetes OpenShift
Purpose Open-source container orchestration platform Enterprise Kubernetes platform with integrated tooling
Best when you need Maximum flexibility and vendor neutrality Pre-integrated enterprise capabilities and support
Primary user(s) Platform engineers, DevOps teams with deep Kubernetes expertise Enterprise IT teams preferring operational simplicity
Headline strength Broad production adoption, zero licensing costs Enterprise support with pre-integrated security and tooling
Limitation Steep learning curve, requires dedicated platform engineering Higher pricing, difficult ROI for smaller organizations
Starting price Free (infrastructure costs only) Subscription-based (~$12,000+/year for self-managed, varies by cores/nodes)
Signature integration Native cloud provider integrations (EKS, GKE, AKS) Built-in CI/CD pipelines and OperatorHub

Overview of Kubernetes

Kubernetes is the open-source container orchestration standard that automates deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications across any infrastructure. Originally developed by Google and now maintained by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, Kubernetes is the de facto platform for cloud-native application deployment, with widespread production adoption across enterprises of all sizes.

Key Features:

  • Automated rollouts and rollbacks with version control
  • Service discovery and load balancing across distributed applications
  • Storage orchestration supporting local, cloud, and network storage systems
  • Secrets and configuration management for security compliance
  • Self-healing with automatic container restart and traffic routing
  • Horizontal pod autoscaling based on resource utilization
  • Multi-cloud deployment portability without vendor lock-in
  • Extensive ecosystem with 100+ certified operators and integrations

Ideal for: Organizations with strong platform engineering teams that prioritize architectural flexibility, cost optimization, and vendor neutrality over operational simplicity.

Overview of OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift is an enterprise Kubernetes container platform that extends vanilla Kubernetes with commercially supported, pre-integrated enterprise capabilities including enhanced security, automated operations, and developer tooling. Recognized as a Leader by both Gartner and Forrester, OpenShift provides a turnkey application development and deployment solution designed for enterprise scale and reliability.

Key Features:

  • Enterprise-ready Kubernetes with SLA commitments for managed services
  • Integrated CI/CD pipelines based on Tekton and Jenkins
  • Built-in security scanning and compliance frameworks
  • OperatorHub with certified application lifecycle management
  • Advanced cluster management across hybrid and multi-cloud environments
  • Developer Console with application deployment workflows
  • OpenShift Virtualization as VMware alternative
  • Pre-integrated monitoring, logging, and observability stack

Ideal for: Mid-to-large enterprises in regulated industries that prioritize operational efficiency, enterprise support, and reduced platform team overhead over cost minimization.

Side-by-Side Feature Comparison

Kubernetes vs OpenShift Capability Comparison
Capability Kubernetes OpenShift
Deployment Model Self-managed or cloud-managed services Self-managed or Red Hat managed services
Security Manual configuration required Built-in RBAC, scanning, compliance frameworks
CI/CD Integration Community tools (Argo CD, Tekton) Integrated OpenShift Pipelines and GitOps
Developer Experience Command-line focused (kubectl) Web console + command-line options
Monitoring Prometheus + Grafana setup required Pre-integrated observability stack
Support Model Community support + cloud provider SLAs Red Hat enterprise support with SLA commitments for managed services
Multi-Cloud Portability Native across all providers Consistent experience with Red Hat management
Learning Curve Steep, requires specialized expertise Simplified through pre-integration
Upgrade Management Manual version management Automated with rollback capabilities
Cost Structure Infrastructure + operational overhead Subscription + infrastructure costs
Ecosystem Open marketplace of tools Curated, certified operator catalog
Compliance Manual policy implementation Built-in frameworks for regulated industries

When to Choose Kubernetes vs. OpenShift

Choose Kubernetes if you need:

  • Zero licensing costs with infrastructure-only expenses
  • Maximum architectural flexibility without vendor constraints
  • Strong internal platform engineering capabilities to manage complexity
  • Multi-cloud portability without platform-specific dependencies
  • Access to the broadest ecosystem of community-maintained tools
  • Complete control over toolchain selection and configuration

Choose OpenShift if you value:

  • Pre-integrated enterprise capabilities reducing operational overhead
  • SLA commitments with Red Hat enterprise support
  • Built-in security, compliance, and governance frameworks
  • Reduced platform team requirements through automation
  • Integrated CI/CD and developer tooling out of the box
  • VMware replacement strategy with OpenShift Virtualization

Both platforms represent viable choices depending on organizational priorities. Kubernetes optimizes for flexibility and cost efficiency, while OpenShift optimizes for operational simplicity and enterprise readiness.

Automate the Service Workflows Around Your Container Infrastructure

Kubernetes and OpenShift handle container orchestration, but the service requests that surround those deployments (cluster access, software licenses, infrastructure changes) still depend on manual coordination between IT, Finance, Security, and the requesting team. Siit automates that coordination layer, routing requests through proper approval channels and provisioning access through your identity provider without platform engineers spending their time as the go-between.

For organizations running either platform, Siit handles the operational side: developers request access through Slack, approvals route automatically, and service desk workflows keep moving without anyone leaving their familiar tools. Your platform team stays focused on container orchestration instead of chasing approvals across departments.

FAQs

Can I migrate from Kubernetes to OpenShift or vice versa?

Yes, both platforms are Kubernetes-compatible, but migration requires planning. Moving from Kubernetes to OpenShift involves adapting to OpenShift's opinionated workflows and integrated tooling. Moving from OpenShift to Kubernetes requires rebuilding the enterprise capabilities that OpenShift provides out-of-the-box.

Which platform is better for small teams with limited DevOps expertise?

OpenShift is generally better for small teams without dedicated platform engineering resources, as it provides pre-integrated capabilities that would require significant expertise to implement with Kubernetes. However, the higher cost may make managed Kubernetes services (EKS, GKE, AKS) more practical for budget-constrained teams.

Do both platforms support the same applications and workloads?

Yes, both platforms run the same containerized applications since OpenShift is built on Kubernetes. However, OpenShift provides additional capabilities for virtual machines (OpenShift Virtualization) and AI workloads (OpenShift AI) that require separate implementation with Kubernetes.

Which platform offers better security for regulated industries?

OpenShift provides built-in security scanning, compliance frameworks, and governance controls designed for regulated industries like financial services and healthcare. Kubernetes requires manual implementation of equivalent security controls, though both can achieve similar security postures with proper configuration.

How do the costs compare for a typical enterprise deployment?

Kubernetes has no licensing fees but requires significant operational investment in platform engineering teams and tooling integration. OpenShift includes licensing costs (~$11,935+ annually) but reduces operational overhead through pre-integration. Total cost of ownership depends on internal team capabilities and operational efficiency priorities.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.