Best Confluence Alternatives (2026): Compared & Rated | Siit

Doren Darmon, HR & Operations Editor · Last updated: August 2026 · Facts verified: August 2026

TL;DR: Teams leave Confluence because of inconsistent search, editor friction, content sprawl, and rising prices, and the self-hosted Data Center edition is now on a fixed shutdown clock. Notion is the strongest all-around replacement for teams that want a flexible wiki with attached databases; XWiki is the pick for self-hosted data control with a dedicated Confluence migrator. Match the tool to what broke first: search or cost.

How We Evaluated Confluence Alternatives

We selected these alternatives based on knowledge-management depth, published pricing, and enough public review evidence on G2, Capterra, Gartner Peer Insights, and practitioner forums to judge each tool honestly. 

The market offers dozens of wikis and knowledge bases. Teams replacing Confluence can choose among all-in-one workspaces, dedicated wikis, and governed or self-hosted platforms.

Confluence Alternatives at a Glance

Replacing Confluence requires balancing knowledge management depth against organizational needs like project integration, compliance, and deployment model. Teams seeking all-in-one platforms often choose Notion or ClickUp; those requiring deep governance or self-hosting look to SharePoint or XWiki; while specialized knowledge bases like Slab, Slite, and Guru prioritize search and content freshness. 

Success depends on matching the tool to your team's primary trigger for change: search performance, editorial friction, or rising costs.

Scores cluster tightly across G2, so fit and deployment model separate these wikis far more than ratings do.

1. Notion

Notion is an all-in-one workspace platform that combines wikis, docs, and relational databases in a single system. It suits startups and mid-market teams consolidating a wiki, a project tracker, and a notes tool into one subscription, and its Confluence importer preserves comments and maps users during full-workspace moves.

Notion Key Features

• Notion Agent: Completes multi-step tasks using workspace context and connected apps, so routine doc and database work runs without manual clicks.
• Enterprise Search: Searches Slack, GitHub, Jira, Box, OneDrive, Salesforce, and Asana alongside Notion content. This cuts the cross-tool hunt that fragments knowledge.
• Page verification: Verified badges surface in search results and AI citations, so readers can trust that a page is current before acting on it.
• Confluence importer: The application programming interface (API) importer handles full workspaces up to 30 GB, retains comments, and maps Confluence users to Notion users by email.

This combination suits teams that need structured records and imported wiki history in one workspace.

Notion Pros and Cons

Pros:

• The same workspace can replace separate documentation and project-tracking subscriptions.
• Adapts to many structures, including engineering runbooks and client portals, without code.
• Templates, nested pages, and per-page permissions cover a full team wiki without custom setup.

Cons:

• Permissions, formulas, and relational structures demand upfront planning.
• The mobile app is slow, with clunky routine actions and missing desktop features.
• Database exports carry only data; structure, properties, and views are lost, raising lock-in risk.

The flexibility comes with more setup work and less complete database exports.

What Users Say About Notion

Reviewers on G2 and Capterra, plus post-migration threads on Reddit, give Notion the most detailed feedback in this category.

• Users report canceling separate project-tracking and documentation subscriptions after centralizing work in Notion.
• Product teams that already switched describe a Linear-plus-Notion stack replacing Jira and Confluence well.
• Hacker News threads describe it as buggy and slow in large, relation-heavy workspaces, and reviewers report the same slowdowns.

User sentiment sourced from G2, Capterra, Reddit, and Hacker News as of August 2026.

Notion Pricing

• Free: $0 per member, with a limited Notion AI trial, 7-day page history, and 10 external guests.
• Plus: $10/member/month. It adds unlimited blocks and file uploads, 30-day page history, and unlimited guests.
• Business: $20/member/month billed annually. It adds Notion Agent, AI Meeting Notes, Enterprise Search, SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) single sign-on (SSO), and 90-day page history.
• Enterprise: custom pricing. It adds SCIM (System for Cross-domain Identity Management) user provisioning, advanced audit logs, and zero data retention with AI model providers.

Pricing from Notion's pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: mid-size teams replacing Confluence and a project tracker in the same move, where wiki pages need to link to live records such as sprints, clients, or assets.

Look for Notion alternatives if: your team works heavily from phones, or a compliance rule requires exportable, structure-preserving backups of every database.

2. ClickUp

ClickUp is a project management platform that ships a docs and wiki layer alongside tasks, sprints, and goals. It fits teams retiring Confluence and a task tracker together, since knowledge stays attached to the work it describes.

ClickUp Key Features

• Docs Hub: Search, sort, and filter all workspace knowledge from one hub, with verified wikis surfaced at the top so people find the sanctioned version first.
• Wikis: Any Doc becomes a wiki with live editing, comments, permissions, and version history, so documentation inherits the same access model as projects.
• Brain AI: Deep search across tasks, Docs, comments, and connected tools including Google Drive, GitHub, and Dropbox, so one query reaches work and documentation together.
• Confluence importer: A self-service importer lands Confluence content directly in the Docs Hub, with a 2.5 GB file limit per import.

ClickUp keeps wiki content in the same system as project work and supports direct Confluence imports.

ClickUp Pros and Cons

Pros:

• A top-level Doc with nested sub-pages centralizes standard operating procedures and guides.
• Nested spaces and granular permissions handle multi-client and shared-vendor setups.
• Direct links between Docs and tasks reduce the need to maintain context in a separate wiki.

Cons:

• AI search is a paid add-on rather than an included capability.
• Long documents load progressively rather than fully, which adds friction to reading and in-document search.
• The depth of configurable options means the workspace needs shaping before Docs behave like a wiki.

Teams get tighter task integration, but should expect a heavier setup and weaker long-document handling.

What Users Say About ClickUp

The r/clickup community supplies the most candid signal on how the docs layer holds up under heavy document loads.

• Migrating standard operating procedures (SOPs) and guides into a top-level Doc with nested sub-pages is described as a major improvement over scattered spaces and folders.
• A user moving off Jira and Confluence found search returning results across too many categories at once, calling it useless next to dedicated tools.
• Reports of lag, delayed status changes, and text disappearing mid-edit persist, and some users keep a dedicated wiki tool for reference docs even while running ClickUp as their work hub.

User sentiment sourced from Reddit as of August 2026.

ClickUp Pricing

• Free Forever: $0, including one wiki and core Docs functionality.
• Unlimited: $7/user/month billed annually ($10 monthly).
• Business: $12/user/month billed annually ($19 monthly).
• Enterprise: contact sales; includes SAML SSO and SCIM, plus unlimited wikis.
• AI add-ons: Brain AI at $9/user/month; Everything AI at $28/user/month, purchased separately from base plans.

Pricing from ClickUp's pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: agencies and operations teams already running client work in ClickUp who want SOPs and project docs inside the same permission structure as the tasks they govern.

Look for ClickUp alternatives if: static reference documentation is the primary job, or fast search inside long documents is non-negotiable.

3. Microsoft SharePoint

Microsoft SharePoint is an intranet and document management platform that pairs governed document libraries with Microsoft Purview compliance controls inside Microsoft 365. It fits organizations that need finished, company-wide content under strict edit control.

Microsoft SharePoint Key Features

• Document libraries: Version history, access control, and real-time co-authoring keep official files governed in one place.
• Purview compliance: Data loss prevention (DLP), sensitivity labels, and retention labels are applied manually or by policy, so regulated files carry their retention and sensitivity rules wherever they are shared.
• Copilot in SharePoint: Creates sites, pages, lists, libraries, and Office files from natural language. Preview began in mid-June 2026, and the feature lowers the build cost of intranet pages.
• Agent knowledge source: Declarative agents answer questions grounded in SharePoint lists and scanned portable document format (PDF) files. The feature rolled out in February 2026, so staff can query list data and scanned documents without opening the site.

These features favor governed intranets and official document libraries over lightweight daily wiki editing.

Microsoft SharePoint Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Finished files and intranet pages stay under stricter edit control than content in a daily-use wiki.
• Included with existing Microsoft 365 tenants, with no separate product to procure.
• Content lives in the same tenant as identity, email, and Teams.

Cons:

• Admin controls are spread across SharePoint, Purview, Entra, and Teams admin centers with no single governance view, and many processes require PowerShell.
• The document-library paradigm suits stored files better than fast-edit wiki pages.
• Copilot is unavailable in Microsoft 365 government and air-gapped tenants.

Deep governance comes with more administrative and page-editing overhead than a dedicated wiki.

What Users Say About Microsoft SharePoint

Sentiment is administrator-driven, and it centers on permissions and site sprawl.

• Practitioners who run SharePoint alongside a wiki describe it as the intranet for finished, company-wide information with strict edit control, keeping frequently changing documentation elsewhere.
• Admins report unique permissions accumulating over time until access becomes difficult to audit.
• Every new Team, private channel, or Microsoft 365 Group automatically spawns a SharePoint site, and admins describe the resulting sprawl as the main maintenance burden.

User sentiment sourced from practitioner discussion on the Atlassian Community as of August 2026.

Microsoft SharePoint Pricing

Standalone SharePoint Plan 1 and Plan 2 were retired as of January 2026, so SharePoint now ships only inside Microsoft 365 suites; Microsoft also raised Business tier prices in July 2026, taking Business Basic from $6.00 to $7.00.

• Microsoft 365 Business Basic: $7.00/user/month annually, with 1 TB storage per user.
• Microsoft 365 Business Standard with Copilot: $23.50/user/month annually.
• Microsoft 365 Business Premium with Copilot: $32.00/user/month annually.
• Enterprise: Office 365 E1 at $10.00, Microsoft 365 E3 at $39.00, and E5 at $60.00 per user per month on an annual commitment. E5 includes the most advanced Purview controls.
• Copilot add-on: Microsoft 365 Copilot Business at $18.00/user/month, paid yearly, for eligible Business plans up to 300 users.

Pricing from Microsoft's SharePoint plans page and enterprise plans page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: organizations with regulatory mandates around DLP, retention, and auditing that are already licensed for Microsoft 365 and want the intranet governed in the same tenant.

Look for Microsoft SharePoint alternatives if: you want a low-friction wiki where anyone edits pages daily without a governance program behind it.

4. Coda (Superhuman Docs)

Coda, now Superhuman Docs, is a document platform that combines pages with live tables, formulas, and automations. It serves operations and product teams that want docs to behave like lightweight internal apps.

Coda Key Features

• Connected tables, views, and forms: One dataset is rendered as tables, boards, or forms across pages, so a single source of truth feeds every view.
• Buttons and automations: Integrations with Jira, GitHub, Figma, Slack, Gmail, and Google Calendar move work without copy-paste.
• Confluence importer: Supports both Cloud and On-premises Confluence via the /Confluence command, and a Confluence Pack can export Coda pages back to Confluence during a phased move.
• Docs AI (Beta): Builds trackers, tables, and dashboards from prompts. This cuts the setup work that structured docs usually require.

Coda is strongest when documentation must also hold structured data and run workflows.

Coda Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Replaces a docs tool, a tracker, and a spreadsheet-database tool in one workspace.
• The formula language supports genuinely sophisticated internal tooling.
• A strong template gallery and active community shorten time to value.

Cons:

• Performance degrades in large documents and tables past roughly 5,000 to 10,000 rows.
• Formulas and automations carry a steep learning curve that pushes teams toward a dedicated admin.
• Cloud-only, with limited portability: tables export, but formulas, buttons, and automations do not.

Its structured logic is more extensive than a plain wiki, while administration and portability are more demanding.

What Users Say About Coda

Technically minded reviewers on Hacker News and Gartner Peer Insights write the sharpest Coda commentary in both directions.

• Sophisticated users describe the formula language as approaching spreadsheet-grade data power.
• Gartner Peer Insights reviewers praise customizable dashboards with role-based filtering, conditional formatting, and automated routing.
• Hacker News users find it slower and buggier than Notion for routine database work, and Reddit describes the mobile app as slow with a messy document browser.

User sentiment sourced from Gartner Peer Insights, Reddit, and Hacker News as of August 2026.

Coda Pricing

Only Doc Makers are charged; editors and viewers are always free. This sharply lowers costs for view-heavy teams.

• Free: $0, with collaborative docs, connected tables, low automation quotas, and 7-day version history.
• Pro: $12/Doc Maker/month (billed annually; $15 monthly). It adds unlimited doc size, 30-day history, and custom domains, with Grammarly bundled on annual billing.
• Business: $33/Doc Maker/month annually ($40 monthly). It adds unlimited automations, unlimited version history, cross-doc tables, and doc locking.
• Enterprise: custom pricing. It adds SAML SSO, SCIM, System and Organization Controls 2 (SOC 2) Type 2, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) support, and access to the Data Center importer.

Pricing from Coda's pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: teams replacing Confluence plus a tracker or Airtable-style database at once, with at least one builder willing to own the formulas and automations.

Look for Coda alternatives if: you need plain documentation everyone can create equally, or your pages will carry very large tables.

5. Slite

Slite is an AI-first knowledge base platform built for mid-size teams, differentiated by cross-tool AI search and automated doc verification. It targets the specific failure mode that kills most wikis: stale knowledge-base content.

Slite Key Features

• Ask (AI search): Answers questions from your docs and also searches connected tools including Slack, Jira, Linear, Google Drive, GitHub, and Salesforce.
• Doc verification and Knowledge Management Panel: Detects outdated and duplicate docs, so every doc has an owner and an expiry date.
• Slite Agent: Autonomously structures and verifies docs and fact-checks content with suggested fixes, so cleanup does not depend on someone auditing the wiki by hand.
• AI answers in Slack: Delivers responses where employees already ask questions.

Slite combines search with ownership controls designed to keep answers current.

Slite Pros and Cons

Pros:

• A lightweight, thoughtfully designed editor that needs minimal training.
• AI answers in Slack reduce the need to open the knowledge base for routine questions.
• AI search handles multilingual teams well.

Cons:

• Tables lack cell merge, borders, and shading, which makes complex layouts impractical.
• No offline access, and the integration catalog is thinner than Notion's or SharePoint's.
• Stability bugs surface: pages can crash when pasting into tables, and edits made in a shared doc can fail to register until the page is refreshed.

The focus on freshness and simple writing leaves less room for complex formatting or offline work.

What Users Say About Slite

Reviewers on G2 and commenters on Hacker News praise the editor and the freshness model; complaints focus on durability.

• Hacker News commenters call it a much simpler, cleaner substitute for Confluence.
• The AI search is described as powerful and multilingual, though users want it inside the main search bar rather than a separate window.
• Post-switch signals on Reddit skew negative: one product-management user preferred Confluence after moving, and a G2 reviewer reported a collection-wide data loss that required support to restore a backup.

User sentiment sourced from G2, Reddit, and Hacker News as of August 2026.

Slite Pricing

Slite has no free tier; it offers a 14-day trial instead.

• Basic: $10/user/month billed annually, with 5 GB per user, 30 AI edits and 30 AI questions monthly, and AI search over Slite docs only.
• Pro: $20/user/month billed annually. It adds unlimited AI writing, cross-tool AI search, 50 monthly agent credits, AI answers in Slack, and OpenID SSO.
• Enterprise: custom pricing, with SCIM provisioning.

Pricing from Slite's pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: mid-size teams whose core Confluence pain is stale, ownerless documentation, since they're buying the verification workflow.

Look for Slite alternatives if: your documentation depends on complex tables and formatting, or offline access matters.

6. Nuclino

Nuclino is a lightweight wiki platform built around speed and minimal onboarding. It renders the same content as lists, boards, tables, or a graph. It suits small and mid-size teams that prize adoption over structure.

Nuclino Key Features

• Multiple content views: List, board, table, and graph views of one dataset; the graph maps relationships between items so connected knowledge stays navigable.
• Real-time collaboration: Simultaneous editing with near-instant saves keeps the tool out of the way of the writing.
• Sidekick AI: Answers questions, drafts copy, and generates images inside the wiki, so writers stay in one tool.
• Website publishing: Collections publish as a public site so that a team wiki can double as external documentation.

Nuclino keeps editing and navigation simple across several views of the same content.

Nuclino Pros and Cons

Pros:

• New users contribute without training, which removes the adoption fight most wikis lose.
• The graph view differentiates it for viewing interconnected docs.
• Markdown handling is smooth for writers coming from technical tools.

Cons:

• A low formatting ceiling: limited table controls, no find-and-replace, and restricted hyperlink editing.
• No bulk export of a collection to a single PDF or Word document.
• No self-hosted option and no built-in project management tools.

Speed and adoption come at the expense of advanced formatting, exports, and administration.

What Users Say About Nuclino

Speed shows up in nearly every positive Nuclino review on G2 and Hacker News.

• Users describe it as blazingly fast with near-instant saves and strong indexing, even after importing large note collections.
• Search returns zero results on typos, with no fuzzy matching to catch them.
• Reviewers question value for larger teams, noting the per-user cost sits near Confluence's while offering fewer apps, integrations, and features.

User sentiment sourced from G2 and Hacker News as of August 2026.

Nuclino Pricing

Yearly billing saves up to 25% versus monthly.

• Free: $0/user, capped at 50 items total, 2 GB storage, and 3 canvases, with no version history.
• Starter: $6/user/month, with 10 GB per user, unlimited items, and 30-day version history.
• Business: an unpublished per-user rate above Starter. It adds Sidekick AI, SAML single sign-on, audit logs, 20 GB per user, and unlimited version history.

Pricing from Nuclino's pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: small teams where everyone should be editing on day one and nobody will be trained on the tool first.

Look for Nuclino alternatives if: you need media-heavy documentation, bulk exports, or compliance-driven feature depth.

7. Slab

Slab is a knowledge base platform focused purely on the wiki job: structured writing, content verification, and search that reaches into the other tools where documentation hides. It suits teams that want knowledge management without adopting a broader work platform.

Slab Key Features

• Unified search: Spans Slack, Google Drive, GitHub, Dropbox, Box, Asana, Confluence, and Trello, so one query can cover documentation stored across those services.
• Content verification: Flags stale posts on every plan, so readers know whether a page still reflects reality.
• Topics with multi-category tagging: One post lives in several areas simultaneously. This reduces duplication and eases navigation.
• AI suite: AI Autofix and AI Ask, which answer questions over the knowledge base.

Slab concentrates on writing, verification, and cross-tool retrieval without adding project-management features.

Slab Pros and Cons

Pros:

• A clean, distraction-free writing experience with low friction.
• Markdown shortcuts and code syntax highlighting speed up writing for engineering-adjacent teams.
• Works as a pure wiki, with no project-management baggage to configure or ignore.

Cons:

• Tables are immature compared with Confluence or Coda for structured data.
• No image alignment or text wrapping, and no dead-link checking.
• A narrower integration catalog and smaller community than Notion or SharePoint.

Slab's focused wiki design comes with fewer layout controls and integrations.

What Users Say About Slab

Hacker News commenters are unusually warm toward Slab as a Confluence replacement.

• It is described as far better than Confluence for teams that need a focused knowledge base without enterprise overhead.
• Markdown shortcuts and code syntax highlighting make content creation fast, especially for engineering-adjacent writers.
• Deeply nested subtopics become overwhelming to navigate, and Google Drive imports arrive poorly structured and require manual cleanup.

User sentiment sourced from Capterra and Hacker News as of August 2026.

Slab Pricing

Paid plans carry a 14-day trial.

• Free: $0 for up to 10 users, with 10 MB attachments and 90-day version history.
• Startup: $6.67/user/month billed annually, with unlimited users, 25 MB attachments, 365-day history, and AI Autofix.
• Business: $12.50/user/month billed annually. It adds 100 MB attachments, unlimited history, AI Predict and AI Ask, SAML SSO, SCIM, GraphQL API, and webhooks.
• Enterprise: custom pricing with a 100-user minimum. It adds advanced AI Ask, audit logs, and dedicated support.

Pricing from Slab's pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: engineering-adjacent teams whose documentation is already scattered across Slack, Drive, and GitHub, where the cross-tool search pays for itself.

Look for Slab alternatives if: your pages need real tables, databases, or rich media layouts.

8. Guru

Guru is an enterprise knowledge management platform that surfaces verified answers inside Slack, Microsoft Teams, Salesforce, and Zendesk. It targets customer support and revenue teams that need trusted answers mid-conversation more than long-form engineering wikis.

Guru Key Features

• AI Knowledge Agents: Permission-aware answers drawn from 100+ connected sources, so people only see content they are entitled to.
• Verification workflows: Scheduled expert re-confirmation with audit trails keeps frontline answers trustworthy over time.
• Browser extension: Surfaces answers inside whatever tool is open. This removes the tab-switch that kills knowledge-base adoption.
• Enterprise data controls: Role-based access and DLP masking, with AI that does not train on customer data. These controls suit regulated teams.

Guru is designed to deliver governed answers inside the tools support and revenue teams use.

Guru Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Answers arrive in the flow of work, which cuts context switching for frontline teams.
• Centralizing scattered knowledge reduces repeated questions from Slack threads and shared drives.
• Governance depth (verification cadence, audit trails, access controls) is rare in this category.

Cons:

• The card structure forces workarounds for step-by-step flows and decision trees.
• Accuracy decays when card owners skip maintenance, so the model depends on discipline.
• No self-serve trial; evaluation runs through a sales cycle.

Guru's in-workflow delivery and governance favor frontline answers over long-form technical documentation.

What Users Say About Guru

Reviews on G2 and Gartner Peer Insights split by team type: support reviewers praise answer delivery, while documentation-heavy teams push back on the card format.

• A sysadmin community thread reports choosing Guru specifically because automated review notifications satisfied compliance requirements.
• Reviewers call card creation simple and the interface modern, which makes contribution easy for non-writers.
• Search is described as increasingly lackluster as the card collection grows, with an overreliance on exact terms and too many near-duplicate results.

User sentiment sourced from G2, Capterra, Gartner Peer Insights, and Reddit as of August 2026.

Guru Pricing

• All plans: quote-based. Guru publishes no per-user pricing; packages are seat-based, with value delivered through usage and credits, arranged through a sales call.

Pricing from Guru's pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: customer support and sales organizations where agents need verified answers inside Zendesk or Salesforce mid-ticket, with compliance teams watching the review trail.

Look for Guru alternatives if: long-form engineering documentation is the priority, or you need self-serve evaluation on a fixed budget.

9. XWiki

XWiki is an open-source knowledge management platform under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) that runs self-hosted or as managed cloud, with migration tooling that carries page history, permissions, and attachments out of Confluence Extensible Markup Language (XML) backups.

It fits organizations with data-sovereignty or air-gapped requirements that Confluence Cloud cannot meet.

XWiki Key Features

• Confluence Migration Toolkit: Migrates pages, history, users, permissions, attachments, and metadata from Confluence XML backups, and handles common macros; Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)-based importers do not carry that much.
• Deployment freedom: Runs on Linux, Tomcat, Jetty, Docker, or Debian, including fully air-gapped environments where SaaS wikis are non-starters.
• Enterprise authentication: LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) and Active Directory plus OIDC (OpenID Connect) and SAML options, so accounts stay governed by the directory the organization already runs.
• Bundled Pro Apps: Diagrams, task manager, calendar, file manager, and an OnlyOffice connector, so common wiki add-ons do not need separate licensing.

XWiki combines self-hosting freedom with migration support for complex Confluence data.

XWiki Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Open source under the LGPL, so the code and the data stay inspectable and portable.
• Full data control, from managed European cloud down to air-gapped self-hosting.
• Granular permissions and nested pages support complex page hierarchies and access models.

Cons:

• Migration runs demand high memory and cache tuning beyond casual admin comfort.
• Complex Confluence macros such as Scroll Versions and Excerpt have no direct equivalents.
• The Java stack raises self-hosting complexity compared with lighter wikis.

XWiki offers the most deployment control in this group, but it requires stronger administration skills.

What Users Say About XWiki

Self-hosting communities on Reddit treat XWiki as the reference point for open-source Confluence replacements.

• The r/selfhosted consensus is that nothing open source fully matches Confluence's feature set, and XWiki comes closest.
• Regulated teams evaluating on-prem replacements describe the move as a multi-year project, which keeps some on Jira Data Center longer than planned.
• Migration reports say standard pages, titles, and common macros transfer cleanly, with the remaining rework concentrated in third-party macros.

User sentiment sourced from Reddit and a thread in r/jira as of August 2026.

XWiki Pricing

Three-year subscriptions save 20%, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and academic institutions receive a 50% discount.

• Starter: free self-setup on the Community tier; the Confluence Migration Toolkit is not included at this level.
• Basic: €5,628/year managed cloud for up to 1,000 users, with the Migration Toolkit and Pro Apps included.
• Business: €10,890/year for up to 10,000 users.
• Enterprise: €33,000/year with unlimited users.

Pricing from XWiki's pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: organizations with data-sovereignty, regulatory, or air-gapped constraints, including Confluence Data Center customers that want to keep self-hosting rather than move to Atlassian Cloud.

Look for XWiki alternatives if: you have no Linux or Java administration capacity in-house and want a polished SaaS editing experience out of the box.

Where Siit Fits

Siit is an AI Service Desk that runs in Slack and Microsoft Teams and answers employee requests using the knowledge base a company already maintains. It connects to 500+ connectable apps across IT, HR, and operations.

Knowledge-source compatibility matters when choosing a wiki because it determines what the service desk can answer. Siit's Confluence integration pulls articles and how-tos from the knowledge base and delivers answers inside Slack or Teams, and the Notion integration does the same for teams that migrate. 

Admins decide which pages serve as answers, and agents reply in Slack using that content without leaving the channel.

The honest limit: Siit natively supports Notion, Confluence, and Slab as knowledge sources, so teams choosing a wiki outside those three should confirm coverage before migrating. To see what connects, explore Siit's integrations.