n8n vs. Make: Which Is Right for Your Team?

Compare n8n and Make to find the right fit for your team, whether you need n8n's self-hosted data sovereignty and developer-grade customization or Make's visual scenario builder and broad no-code accessibility.

Both n8n and Make let teams automate workflows across dozens of apps, but they're built for very different kinds of teams. n8n draws developers and technically-inclined IT teams who want code-level control and the option to run everything on their own infrastructure. Make appeals to ops and business teams who want a powerful visual builder without writing a line of code. Understanding workflow automation approaches matters before you commit.

n8n vs. Make at a glance

Here's how these two platforms stack up on the features that matter most to IT and ops teams.

Overview of n8n

n8n is a workflow automation platform built for technical teams who need more than a point-and-click builder. It runs on a fair-code license, supports self-hosting via Docker or Kubernetes, and lets developers write JavaScript or Python directly inside workflow nodes. Beyond standard automation, n8n ships native AI agent nodes, LangChain integration, and MCP node support for teams building production AI workflows.

Key features:

• Visual node-based canvas with developer-grade debugging
• Self-hosting via Docker or Kubernetes; air-gapped deployments are supported for self-hosted/offline setups, though the documentation specifically evidences this for Docker rather than explicitly for Kubernetes
• Native JavaScript and Python code execution within workflows
• 400+ native integrations including Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot, and GitHub
• AI agent nodes with memory, goal-oriented task completion, and human-in-the-loop controls
• Native LangChain integration and MCP node support
• Git-based version control (Business and Enterprise)
• External secret store support (Enterprise)

Ideal for: Technical teams and DevOps-mature organizations that need self-hosted data sovereignty, deep workflow customization, or production AI agent orchestration.

Overview of Make

Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual-first iPaaS and workflow automation platform built for teams who want powerful automation without writing code. Its drag-and-drop scenario builder handles complex branching logic, data transformation, and multi-app orchestration through a single canvas. Formerly acquired by Celonis, Make was launched as its own business unit within Celonis in 2022.

Key features:

• Visual scenario builder with drag-and-drop module connections
• 3,000+ pre-built app integrations including HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, and NetSuite
• Dedicated AI category in the Apps Center
• Custom JavaScript and Python execution via Make Code App
• HTTP/Webhook module for connecting to any public API
• Make Grid: auto-generated view of your entire automation landscape
• SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliant with SSO (Enterprise)
• Operations-based pricing with transparent public tiers

Ideal for: Business operations and mixed technical/non-technical teams that need fast deployment, a wide integration library, and a visual workflow builder that non-developers can actually use.

Side-by-Side Feature Comparison

When to Choose n8n vs. Make

Both platforms can handle sophisticated multi-step automation. The decision comes down to who's building the workflows and what constraints you're working within.

Choose n8n if you need:

• Full data sovereignty: self-hosted on your own infrastructure, including air-gapped environments
• Developers or engineers who want JavaScript, Python, or custom node development as your primary workflow builders
• Production AI agent workflows with LangChain, RAG, or MCP server integration
• Git-based version control and dev/staging/prod environments for workflow lifecycle management
• A fair-code license with auditable source code and no vendor lock-in risk
• Execution-based pricing that stays flat regardless of workflow complexity

Choose Make if you value:

• A visual canvas that non-technical team members can actually use without developer support
• Access to 3,000+ pre-built integrations with faster out-of-the-box connectivity
• Transparent, publicly listed pricing tiers you can model before talking to sales
• SOC 2 Type II compliance across all plans, not just Enterprise
• Make Grid for maintaining visibility across a large portfolio of automation scenarios
• Fast deployment without infrastructure setup or DevOps overhead

Neither platform is universally better. n8n wins on control and customization; Make wins on accessibility and integration breadth.

Automate the Service Workflows Around Your Automation Stack

n8n and Make both handle what happens inside a workflow, triggering actions, moving data between apps, and executing logic. What they don't handle is the layer of coordination that surrounds those workflows: cross-departmental access provisioning, approval routing, and the service requests that kick off automation in the first place. That's where Siit fits. Siit's AI agents manage the human coordination layer, routing requests, chasing approvals, and executing actions across identity providers like Okta and device management tools like Jamf, so the right workflows actually get triggered with the right context.

Whether your team is running n8n for developer-led automation or Make for business ops, Siit connects the service request workflows that feed into those platforms. Employees submit requests in Slack or Microsoft Teams, Siit handles triage, approval routing, and provisioning through native integrations with tools like BambooHR, Okta, and Google Workspace, and your automation stack executes what it was built to do, without manual coordination overhead in between.

Book a demo with Siit today.