Jenkins vs. GitHub Actions: Which Is Right for Your Team?
Compare Jenkins and GitHub Actions features, pricing, and scalability. Find which CI/CD automation platform fits your team's needs.
Jenkins gives you maximum customization for complex enterprise pipelines. GitHub Actions gives you native GitHub integration with minimal setup. The right pick depends on your infrastructure, team expertise, and how much maintenance you're willing to take on.
Jenkins is an open-source automation server with 1,800+ plugins that connect to virtually any tool in your stack — including legacy systems most cloud-native platforms can't touch. GitHub Actions is built directly into GitHub, so teams already using it for source control can add CI/CD without standing up separate infrastructure. Both automate build, test, and deployment workflows, but they take fundamentally different approaches to flexibility, ownership, and operational overhead.
Jenkins vs. GitHub Actions at a glance
Here's how these two CI/CD platforms compare across key evaluation criteria.
Overview of Jenkins
Jenkins is an open-source automation server that functions as both a CI/CD platform and a general-purpose automation hub. Originally designed for continuous integration, Jenkins has evolved into a comprehensive DevOps automation platform through its extensive plugin architecture. The platform operates through a controller-agent model, enabling distributed builds across multiple environments and supporting complex enterprise workflows.
Key Features:
- 2,000+ Plugin Ecosystem: Largest integration library in CI/CD market
- Distributed Build Architecture: Controller-agent model for scalable infrastructure
- Pipeline as Code: Declarative and scripted pipeline definitions stored in version control
- Enterprise Security Controls: RBAC, LDAP/Active Directory integration, build authorization
- Self-Hosted Infrastructure: Complete control over deployment environment and data
- Universal Platform Support: Linux, Windows, macOS with container and cloud integrations
- Advanced Workflow Orchestration: Complex conditional logic and parallel execution
- Extensive Cloud Integration: AWS, Azure, GCP plugins with OIDC authentication
Ideal for: Organizations requiring maximum customization, on-premise deployment mandates, complex legacy system integration, or vendor-independent infrastructure control.
Overview of GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions is a native CI/CD automation platform integrated directly into GitHub's repository infrastructure. Unlike standalone CI/CD tools, Actions operates as an event-driven automation system that responds to repository activities, including pull requests, issues, and releases. The platform combines GitHub-hosted runners with self-hosted options, enabling workflows that scale from simple automation to enterprise deployment pipelines.
Key Features:
- Native GitHub Integration: Seamless access to repository context, pull requests, and GitHub API
- 20,000+ Marketplace Actions: Pre-built integrations and community-contributed workflows
- Flexible Runner Architecture: GitHub-hosted and self-hosted execution environments
- Reusable Workflows: Composable, organization-wide workflow templates for governance
- Matrix Build Strategies: Parallel execution across multiple configurations and environments
- Enterprise Compliance: SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications with audit logging
- Cloud-Native Architecture: Serverless execution model with elastic scaling
- Advanced OIDC Integration: Secure, temporary credentials for AWS, Azure, and GCP deployments
Ideal for: Development teams using GitHub for source control who need streamlined CI/CD with minimal infrastructure overhead and rapid time-to-value.
Side-by-Side Feature Comparison
When to Choose Jenkins vs. GitHub Actions
Choose Jenkins if you need:
- Maximum customization through 2,000+ plugins for specialized tool integration
- On-premise deployment to meet data sovereignty or compliance requirements
- Integration with legacy systems that lack modern API support
- Complete infrastructure control without vendor platform dependencies
- Complex, multi-stage pipelines requiring extensive conditional logic
- Existing DevOps expertise comfortable with infrastructure management
- Budget constraints where infrastructure costs are preferred over licensing fees
Choose GitHub Actions if you value:
- Seamless GitHub integration, eliminating context switching between tools
- Rapid deployment with minimal setup and infrastructure overhead
- Cloud-native architecture with elastic scaling and managed infrastructure
- Streamlined developer experience with native pull request integration
- Modern OIDC authentication patterns for secure cloud deployments
- Usage-based pricing model aligned with actual consumption
- Comprehensive compliance certifications without additional configuration
Position both as viable depending on organizational needs, technical requirements, and existing infrastructure investments.
How Siit Connects Your CI/CD Pipeline to Internal Operations
Your CI/CD platform handles code-to-deployment. Everything around it — access requests, change approvals, stakeholder notifications — still runs on manual coordination across three departments and 45 minutes of back-and-forth.
Siit automates that coordination layer. Access requests in Slack trigger AI-powered workflows that verify employee data, route approvals, and provision access automatically. Siit integrates directly with GitHub for request escalation and context syncing between engineering and IT. Teams running Jenkins benefit from Siit's workflow automation for the operational work pipelines that can't reach cross-department approvals, audit documentation, and change management.
Start a free trial to see how Siit handles the coordination work your CI/CD platform leaves behind.
FAQs
Can Jenkins and GitHub Actions work together in the same organization?
Yes, many organizations use both platforms strategically—GitHub Actions for repository-specific workflows and rapid prototyping, while Jenkins handles enterprise deployment pipelines and legacy system integration. This hybrid approach leverages each platform's strengths without forcing a single-tool decision.
Which platform offers better performance for large-scale builds?
Performance depends on workload characteristics. Research shows GitHub Actions performs faster than Jenkins for standard Ubuntu builds, but Jenkins' distributed architecture can outperform GitHub Actions for CPU-intensive workloads when properly configured with dedicated self-hosted infrastructure.
How do the total costs compare between Jenkins and GitHub Actions?
Jenkins is free, while GitHub Actions costs $2,400-33,240 annually, depending on usage and plan tier. GitHub's 2026 pricing changes reduce hosted runner costs by up to 39%. A planned $0.002/minute platform charge for self-hosted runners was announced for March 2026, but has been postponed for re-evaluation following developer pushback. Public repository usage remains free.
Which platform provides better security for enterprise environments?
Both platforms support enterprise security requirements. Jenkins offers granular RBAC and on-premise deployment for maximum control, while GitHub Actions provides SOC 2, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS compliance with managed security updates. The choice depends on whether security-through-control (Jenkins) or security-through-managed-infrastructure (GitHub Actions) aligns with organizational requirements.
How difficult is migration between these platforms?
Migration complexity varies significantly. Moving from Jenkins to GitHub Actions requires rewriting pipeline configurations and may lose complex plugin functionality. GitHub provides migration tools, but they have documented limitations. Organizations should plan 2-4 weeks for standard pipeline migration, plus additional time for complex workflow recreation.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.