CyberArk vs. Okta: Which Is Right for Your Team?
Compare CyberArk and Okta features, pricing, and use cases. Find which identity platform fits your security and access needs.
CyberArk and Okta represent two distinct approaches to enterprise identity security. CyberArk specializes in privileged access management with deep security controls for high-risk accounts, while Okta provides comprehensive workforce identity management with broad application integration. Both solutions serve enterprise needs but address different security priorities and organizational requirements.
CyberArk vs. Okta at a glance
Here's how these leading identity platforms compare across key dimensions for IT decision makers.
Overview of CyberArk
CyberArk is a purpose-built Identity Security Platform that evolved from—and remains the market leader in—Privileged Access Management (PAM). The platform has achieved Gartner Leader status for seven consecutive years and provides comprehensive governance, access controls, and threat protection across human, machine, and AI identities.
Key Features:
- Enterprise Password Vault (EPV) for centralized credential management.
- Privileged Session Manager (PSM) with session isolation and recording.
- Application Secrets Management for DevOps credential security.
- On-Demand Privileges Manager (OPM) for just-in-time access.
- Endpoint Identity Security with distributed workforce protection.
- AI-powered continuous authentication and threat detection.
- Zero Standing Privileges architecture.
- Certificate and SSH key management.
Ideal for: Large enterprises with thousands of privileged accounts requiring deep security controls, compliance frameworks, and specialized PAM capabilities.
Overview of Okta
Okta is a cloud-based Identity-as-a-Service (IDaaS) platform providing enterprise-grade identity and access management for workforce, customer, and AI agent identities. Named a Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader in Access Management for nine consecutive years (2017-2025), Okta delivers core IAM functionality with exceptional ease of use.
Key Features:
- Single Sign-On (SSO) with multi-protocol support across 7,000+ applications.
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) with adaptive security policies.
- Universal Directory as a centralized identity store.
- Automated user lifecycle management with SCIM standards.
- API Access Management with OAuth 2.0/OIDC authorization.
- Mobile identity management with device policies.
- ThreatInsight network-wide threat detection.
- Zero Trust security architecture.
Ideal for: Organizations with 100-1,000+ employees needing comprehensive workforce identity management, extensive application integrations, and streamlined user experience.
Side-by-Side Feature Comparison
When to Choose CyberArk vs. Okta
Choose CyberArk if you need:
- Deep privilege security for critical infrastructure and database servers.
- Comprehensive compliance requirements (PCI-DSS, SOX, HIPAA) with detailed audit trails.
- Session recording and isolation for administrative access.
- Machine identity security for DevOps environments and cloud workloads.
- Zero standing privilege architectures with just-in-time access.
- Purpose-built PAM capabilities rather than general IAM features.
Choose Okta if you value:
- Broad workforce single sign-on across thousands of applications.
- Rapid deployment with minimal training and change management.
- Platform-agnostic integration flexibility beyond Microsoft ecosystems.
- Streamlined user experience with 4.6/5 ease of use ratings.
- Comprehensive identity governance for standard employee access.
- Cost-effective scaling for mid-market to large enterprise deployments.
How Siit Integrates With Both Tools
Siit provides production-ready integrations with both platforms to streamline IT service management workflows. While Siit doesn't currently offer a native CyberArk integration, teams using CyberArk alongside Okta or other supported identity providers can still benefit from Siit's workflow automation for access request coordination. For Okta users, Siit offers advanced SAML SSO handling, quick actions for adding users to groups and resetting MFA, plus automatic people data synchronization—all accessible directly from Slack and Teams.
Whether your team uses CyberArk's specialized PAM capabilities or Okta's comprehensive identity platform, Siit eliminates the coordination overhead between identity management and employee support. Transform scattered requests into automated workflows that route approvals, provision access, and update systems automatically—giving your team more time for strategic security initiatives.
Sign up for Siit today and see how automated cross-departmental processes can eliminate manual coordination between your identity platform and employee support operations.
FAQs
Can CyberArk and Okta work together in the same environment?
Yes, many enterprises use both platforms in a complementary manner. Okta for general workforce identity management and CyberArk for specialized privileged access management. This hybrid approach addresses both broad user authentication needs and high-security privilege requirements.
Which platform is better for compliance requirements?
CyberArk provides compliance-enabling capabilities such as integrated session recording, detailed audit trails, and controls that help organizations address regulations like PCI-DSS and SOX. Okta supports compliance but focuses more on general identity governance than specialized privilege compliance.
How do implementation timelines compare between the two platforms?
Okta typically deploys faster due to its cloud-native architecture and extensive pre-built integrations. CyberArk implementations are more complex, often requiring 3-6 months with professional services, but provide deeper security controls for critical systems.
Which solution is more cost-effective for mid-sized companies?
Okta offers publicly listed tiered pricing, with its Starter Suite beginning at $6/user/month, but independent sources do not characterize its costs as more predictable than competing platforms such as CyberArk. CyberArk requires custom quotes with higher initial costs and professional services, making it more suitable for enterprises with substantial privileged access requirements. Okta offers publicly listed tiered pricing starting at $6/user/month.
Do both platforms support modern cloud and DevOps environments?
Both support cloud environments, but with different strengths. CyberArk excels at machine identity security, secrets management, and certificate lifecycle management critical for DevOps. Okta provides broader application integration and API access management, but with a lighter focus on non-human identities.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.