Best Okta Alternatives (2026): Compared & Rated | Siit

Doren Darmon, HR & Operations Editor · Last updated: August 2026 · Facts verified: August 2026

TL;DR: Teams outgrow Okta over add-on sprawl and slow rollouts. Microsoft Entra ID is the strongest replacement for Microsoft 365 organizations, since the identity layer is bundled into enterprise licensing they already pay for; JumpCloud fits smaller teams that want directory, access, and device management from one vendor. Everything else depends on stack, scale, and whether the gap is authentication or governance.

How We Evaluated Okta Alternatives

In our evaluation, every vendor had to cover a core workforce identity job, whether single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), user provisioning, or governance. Each also needed public review listings and sufficient product documentation.

IAM tools number in the dozens; these nine cover the main options for teams of 50 to 5,000 employees, including full IdP definitions replacements, MFA layers, and governance platforms bought alongside an identity provider (IdP).

Okta Alternatives at a Glance

Some of these vendors replace Okta outright; others cover only one layer. Microsoft Entra ID, JumpCloud, and Rippling IT fold identity into a wider platform. 

Cisco Duo, OneLogin, and Auth0 focus on one layer; Ping Identity builds for hybrid enterprise scale; SailPoint governs access; another tool authenticates; CyberArk Workforce Identity extends privileged access management into workforce sign-in.

1. Microsoft Entra ID

Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory) is a cloud identity and access management platform delivering SSO, MFA, and Conditional Access across Microsoft 365, Azure, and third-party apps. 

Organizations with Microsoft enterprise licensing can activate an identity layer included in plans they already hold. This makes Entra ID the default first comparison for Okta buyers using Microsoft products.

Microsoft Entra ID Key Features

• Conditional Access: A policy engine that gates every sign-in on risk level, device compliance, and location, so MFA fires when context warrants it instead of on every login.
• Automated provisioning: SCIM-based (System for Cross-domain Identity Management) provisioning to SaaS and on-premises apps plus HR-driven account creation. This reduces manual joiner-mover-leaver work.
• Privileged Identity Management: Just-in-time elevation and access reviews for admin roles. These controls reduce standing privilege.
• Application gallery: Thousands of pre-integrated applications with SSO and provisioning support, so most SaaS apps connect without custom SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) work.

The feature set covers sign-in policy, account provisioning, privileged roles, and application connections.

Microsoft Entra ID Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Automated provisioning reduces manual account work across SaaS and on-premises apps.
• A staged rollout moves user groups off Okta federation in phases, converting provisioning and sign-on policies as it goes.
• Native reach across Microsoft 365, Azure, and hybrid Active Directory provides one identity system for the Microsoft environment.

Cons:

• Admin center complexity and a confusing licensing structure are among the most-cited complaints.
• The app catalog and SCIM provisioning maturity trail Okta's.
• Fit weakens outside the Microsoft environment, including legacy authentication patterns it does not cover well.

These trade-offs matter most for teams with many non-Microsoft applications or limited Entra administration experience.

What Users Say About Microsoft Entra ID

Reviewers on G2 and Gartner Peer Insights frame Entra ID as a Microsoft stack decision first:

• Microsoft integration receives the most praise: one place to control users, devices, and applications across Microsoft 365 and Azure.
• Conditional Access receives strong marks for blocking legacy authentication, enforcing MFA by risk level, and requiring compliant devices.
• Important security features sit across separate licensing tiers, and overlapping policies are hard to reason about.
• Reviewers also flag complex administration and configuration as recurring problems.

User sentiment sourced from Gartner Peer Insights as of August 2026.

Microsoft Entra ID Pricing

• Entra ID Free: $0; included with Azure, Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365, Intune, and Power Platform; covers MFA, SSO across unlimited SaaS apps, and basic reports.
• Entra ID P1: $7/user/month; adds Conditional Access, dynamic groups, automated provisioning, and HR-driven provisioning; bundled with Microsoft 365 E3 and Business Premium.
• Entra ID P2: $10/user/month; adds Identity Protection, risk-based Conditional Access, access reviews, and Privileged Identity Management; bundled with Microsoft 365 E5.
• Entra Suite: $12/user/month; adds Private Access, Internet Access, and lifecycle workflows; requires a P1 license.
• Add-ons: Entra ID Governance at $7/user/month; Workload ID at $3 per workload identity per month.

Pricing from Microsoft's Entra pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: Organizations on Microsoft 365 enterprise plans with hybrid Active Directory, where identity has to move group by group instead of in one weekend cutover.

Look for Microsoft Entra ID alternatives if: Your app portfolio is largely non-Microsoft, or your team lacks the licensing fluency and PowerShell depth reviewers say the platform demands.

2. JumpCloud

JumpCloud is an open directory platform that merges identity, access, and device management for Windows, macOS, and Linux into one console. It targets 500-to-5,000-employee companies with mixed operating-system fleets.

JumpCloud Key Features

• Open cloud directory: One identity store speaking LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol), SAML, and RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service), so legacy and modern apps authenticate against the same source.
• Cross-OS device management: Policy enforcement, software deployment, zero-touch enrollment, and remote lock or wipe for Apple, Windows, and Linux devices from a single console.
• Patch management: Centralized Windows, macOS, and Ubuntu patching that uses Apple's Declarative Device Management protocol for native OS updates.
• Okta import: A real-time SCIM sync that creates, updates, and deactivates JumpCloud users from actions taken in Okta. This supports a phased migration rather than a hard cutover.

These features combine directory services with device administration across the three main desktop operating systems.

JumpCloud Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Directory, SSO, MFA, and device policy fall under a single renewal. This cuts two or three vendor contracts down to one.
• Okta coexistence tooling keeps Okta as the identity source while JumpCloud takes over downstream resources during migration.
• User lifecycle management feeds System and Organization Controls 2 (SOC 2) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) audit evidence directly, a repeated point of praise from compliance-minded reviewers.

Cons:

• macOS policy coverage is command-driven and thinner than the coverage in dedicated MDM tools, with fewer native policy payloads.
• Built-in reporting and audit logs are thin, pushing compliance-grade visibility into external exports.
• Certain Linux distributions, including Fedora 42 and 43, are not fully supported, and Linux disk encryption support is limited.

JumpCloud covers more platforms but offers less macOS policy depth and native reporting.

What Users Say About JumpCloud

G2 commentary clusters around consolidation, administration, and device management:

• Reviewers praise how quickly the platform goes live and how little day-to-day administration it takes.
• The admin console draws complaints for sluggishness and slow policy propagation, and documentation lags feature releases.
• Mac device management draws skepticism because it relies more heavily on commands than native compliance policies.
• Support responsiveness is inconsistent, which can make integration problems harder to resolve.

User sentiment sourced from Capterra as of August 2026.

JumpCloud Pricing

• Device Management: $9/user/month billed annually ($11 billed monthly).
• SSO: $11/user/month billed annually ($13 billed monthly); includes SSO, MFA, and Password Manager.
• Device Identity Management: $13/user/month billed annually ($15 billed monthly).
• Platform Essentials: Contact sales; caps at 300 users.
• Platform: Contact sales.
• Platform Prime: Contact sales.
• À la carte: Individual products such as Cloud Directory, SSO, MFA, and patch management start at $3/user/month, billed annually.
• Trial: 30-day free trial with full platform access; the legacy free tier is restricted to customers who signed up before February 1, 2024.

Pricing from JumpCloud's pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: Lean IT teams running mixed Mac, Windows, and Linux fleets who want a single renewal to cover directory, access, MFA, and device policy, with the option to run Okta in parallel through the SCIM import while migrating.

Look for JumpCloud alternatives if: Deep, policy-native macOS management is mission-critical, or you already own Microsoft Business Premium plus a remote monitoring tool that covers the same ground.

3. Cisco Duo

Cisco Duo is an access security platform centered on MFA and device trust that layers onto an existing directory rather than replacing it. Reviewer accounts describe fast deployment, and Duo changes little about how an organization already runs identity.

Cisco Duo Key Features

• Phishing-resistant MFA: FIDO2 (a passwordless authentication standard) and other phishing-resistant factors meet the bar modern security frameworks set for authenticators.
• Trusted Endpoints: Verifies a device is registered or managed before granting access, which raises the bar beyond credentials alone.
• Duo Passport: Extends one verified login across applications. This cuts repeat prompts without weakening checks.
• Active Directory Defense: Deep Active Directory visibility, posture management, and MFA for legacy authentication protocols, so on-premises protocols that predate MFA fall under the same policy.

Duo's feature set concentrates on stronger authentication and device checks around an existing directory.

Cisco Duo Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Rollout is measured in days, with Active Directory integration reviewers describe as clean and immediate.
• Protocol breadth across SAML 2.0, LDAP, and RADIUS brings MFA to applications that ship no second factor of their own.
• Duo Care support draws consistent praise for being responsive throughout the rollout.

Cons:

• Duo layers MFA and device trust onto an existing directory; directory sync is limited, and lifecycle provisioning is out of scope.
• Push delivery depends on the user's mobile connection, with no equally fast fallback factor for offline users.
• Device migration when users switch phones and offline access handling are recurring weak spots.

Duo is built for MFA deployment rather than full directory or lifecycle management.

What Users Say About Cisco Duo

Reviewer commentary centers on deployment speed, the push experience, and protocol reach:

• Deployment speed is frequently praised, with one Gartner reviewer reporting a working test phase within a day.
• Push-based approval, including from an Apple Watch, and clear authentication visibility in the admin dashboard make daily use low-friction.
• The roughly seven-second push approval window and delayed notifications on weak connections are the most repeated complaints.
• Reviewers identify phone switching and offline login handling as persistent weaknesses.

User sentiment sourced from Gartner Peer Insights as of August 2026.

Cisco Duo Pricing

• Duo Free: $0 for up to 10 users.
• Duo Essentials: $3/user/month; SSO, phishing-resistant MFA, passwordless (FIDO2), and Trusted Endpoints.
• Duo Advantage: $6/user/month; adds Cisco Identity Intelligence, Duo Passport, Risk-Based Authentication, and Active Directory Defense.
• Duo Premier: $9/user/month; adds virtual private network (VPN)-less access to private resources and complete device trust with endpoint protection checks.

Pricing from Duo's editions page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: Security teams keeping their current directory who need phishing-resistant MFA and device trust live within days, including for internal apps that have no native second factor.

Look for Cisco Duo alternatives if: You need a directory of record, lifecycle provisioning, or MFA coverage on non-interactive protocols like Windows Remote Management (WinRM) and Server Message Block (SMB).

4. OneLogin

OneLogin is a workforce access management platform covering SSO, MFA, and directory sync. Its pitch is a lower-lift path to Okta-style access management without an enterprise implementation project.

OneLogin Key Features

• App catalog: Thousands of prebuilt connectors supporting Forms, SAML, and OpenID Connect (OIDC) sign-in, so most SaaS apps connect without custom work.
• SmartFactor Authentication: Risk-based adaptive MFA that adjusts login flows by user identity, location and IP, device type, target application, and time of day.
• Active Directory sync: Includes passwordless login from AD-joined workstations, keeping on-premises directories in the loop.
• HR directory sync: Connects Workday, UKG, Namely, and BambooHR so hires and exits automatically drive account changes.

The platform connects workforce sign-in with Active Directory and HR-driven account changes.

OneLogin Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Basic SSO setup requires little technical knowledge. This shortens time to value.
• MFA options including biometrics and one-time passcodes stay unobtrusive for end users.
• HR-event-driven account automation removes a class of manual joiner and leaver work.

Cons:

• Session instability and intermittent connectivity problems disrupt daily logins.
• Security-report remediation has been slow, with a publicly documented vulnerability disclosure taking months to close.
• Reporting and analytics fall short of enterprise compliance needs.

Reliability, security-response pace, and reporting depth are the main concerns for larger deployments.

What Users Say About OneLogin

Across G2 and Gartner Peer Insights, reliability and support pace shape the OneLogin conversation as much as the SSO core does:

• Consolidating many application logins into one is the top-praised capability, and basic setup earns marks for simplicity.
• Connectivity issues top the complaint list, with unexpected logouts and autofill failures interrupting work.
• SAML integrations and advanced access rules bring a steep learning curve, and documentation on those rules is thin.
• Feature velocity is judged slower than larger rivals.

User sentiment sourced from Gartner Peer Insights as of August 2026.

OneLogin Pricing

• Basic: $3/user/month; authentication and limited user management.
• Essentials: $6/user/month; authentication and user management.
• Business: $10/user/month; advanced authentication and automation, including SmartFactor Authentication and HR directory sync.
• Enterprise: Call for pricing; advanced user management, custom Representational State Transfer (REST) provisioning, and application programming interface (API) access management.
• Add-on: OneLogin Workflows at $2/user/month.

Pricing from OneLogin's pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: Mid-market companies whose joiner and leaver churn already lives in an HR system like Workday or BambooHR and who want that system driving accounts.

Look for OneLogin alternatives if: Login uptime is unforgiving in your environment, or your compliance program depends on deep native reporting and fast vendor security response.

5. Ping Identity

Ping Identity is an enterprise identity platform spanning workforce and customer identity across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployments. It is built for large regulated environments where federation depth and legacy coexistence outweigh setup speed.

Ping Identity Key Features

• DaVinci orchestration: A no-code designer for authentication journeys, so identity flows change without engineering sprints.
• Standards depth: OAuth 2.0, OIDC, SAML, and SCIM support anchored by PingFederate for complex federation scenarios.
• Legacy gateways: LDAP, Kerberos, and RADIUS gateways apply the same policies to older infrastructure and cloud apps.
• Adaptive MFA: Risk- and context-based step-up authentication with FIDO2 and mobile push, so step-up fires only on risky sessions and routine logins stay single-step.

These capabilities prioritize federation flexibility across hybrid and legacy infrastructure.

Ping Identity Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Deployment flexibility across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid suits environments a pure-SaaS IdP cannot fully cover.
• Stability at very large identity volumes is a repeated reviewer theme.
• DaVinci lets non-developers build and change custom authentication journeys.

Cons:

• Enterprise deployments can take over a year to reach full go-live.
• Documentation lacks working examples, and some integration partners balk when Ping is absent from their own docs.
• DaVinci does not match Okta Workflows for lifecycle automation.

Ping's flexibility requires more implementation time and specialist administration than cloud-first alternatives.

What Users Say About Ping Identity

Enterprise reviewers on G2 and Gartner Peer Insights focus on depth, scale, and operational demands:

• Federation and standards breadth earn consistent praise, with PingFederate receiving the highest marks in Ping's portfolio.
• Stability at large identity volumes stands out; one enterprise reviewer described a Kubernetes deployment as unusually stable.
• Extensive configuration options, infrastructure requirements, and troubleshooting difficulty recur as negatives.
• Documentation gaps and limited working examples create integration friction.

User sentiment sourced from Gartner Peer Insights as of August 2026.

Ping Identity Pricing

• PingOne for Workforce Essential: $3/user/month on an annual contract with a 5,000-user minimum.
• PingOne for Workforce Plus: $6/user/month, same minimum and contract terms.
• PingOne for Customers Essential: Starting at $35,000/year.
• PingOne for Customers Plus: Starting at $50,000/year.
• PingOne Advanced Identity Cloud: Quote only.
• Trial: 30-day free trial.

Pricing from Ping's platform pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: Regulated enterprises with hybrid infrastructure and a dedicated IAM engineering team, where a long deployment is an acceptable trade for federation depth and legacy protocol coverage.

Look for Ping Identity alternatives if: You fall below its published user minimum, or cannot staff dedicated identity engineers to run it.

6. Auth0

Auth0 is a customer identity and access management (CIAM) platform for developers building login, authorization, and user management into their own applications. Okta owns Auth0, so it is an alternative to Okta's workforce product but remains under the same corporate vendor.

Auth0 Key Features

• Passkeys: Passwordless and passkey login require no code changes once switched on.
• Migration tooling: Trickle migration imports users on first login and bulk import accepts hashed passwords, so users move over without a password reset.
• Fine-Grained Authorization: A scalable authorization service with a 99.99% availability service-level agreement (SLA) for access decisions.
• AI-agent auth: Token Vault and asynchronous authorization for generative AI applications.

Auth0's features focus on customer login, migration, and application-level authorization.

Auth0 Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Migration paths avoid the user-facing pain that kills CIAM replatforming projects.
• Unlimited social connections are available.
• Machine-to-machine tokens are included.

Cons:

• Advanced features and custom workflows come with a steep learning curve.
• Auth0 is designed for customer identity rather than workforce identity.
• Auth0 remains under Okta ownership, which matters for teams seeking a different vendor.

Auth0 suits customer-login projects rather than employee-access projects.

What Users Say About Auth0

G2 commentary focuses on growth and implementation demands:

• Small businesses report that costs climb quickly as the user base expands.
• Growing applications also report higher costs as usage increases.
• Advanced features carry a steep learning curve.
• Customized workflows require more implementation knowledge.

User sentiment sourced from G2 as of August 2026.

Auth0 Pricing

• Free: $0 for up to 25,000 monthly active users (MAU); community support only.
• Essentials: $35/month for up to 500 MAU, a lower user ceiling than the free tier.
• Professional: $240/month for up to 500 MAU.
• Enterprise: Contact sales; custom volume with a 99.99% SLA.
• Usage changes: Exceeding the usage cap for three consecutive months, passing API request limits, or turning on certain MFA factors can trigger plan upgrades and billing changes.

Pricing from Auth0's pricing page. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: Product and engineering teams embedding login into customer-facing apps, especially when moving an existing user store, since trickle migration brings users over invisibly on first login.

Look for Auth0 alternatives if: The goal is a workforce identity provider, or leaving Okta's corporate umbrella is part of the point.

7. Rippling IT

Rippling IT is the identity and device layer of Rippling's workforce platform, where the HR system of record drives account provisioning, SSO, and device management. It suits small and mid-market companies where hiring events move access.

Rippling IT Key Features

• Event-driven lifecycle: Hires, role changes, and terminations automatically trigger provisioning, deprovisioning, and device actions across connected apps.
• Unified employee record: Pay, HR data, time off, app access, and device inventory share one record. This removes sync jobs between an HRIS (human resources information system) and an IdP.
• App access from the record: Access grants follow the employee's role and status, with no manual request step.
• Cross-platform device management: Mixed Windows and Mac fleets managed alongside identity, with asset status feeding compliance tooling.

The shared employee record links HR events to account and device actions.

Rippling IT Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Onboarding and offboarding run without a ticket queue because the HR event triggers them.
• Device and asset status flow straight from the employee record into compliance tooling; practitioners running mixed fleets report piping it into Vanta for audit evidence.
• Reviewers frequently praise the platform's ease of use.

Cons:

• Device management depth trails dedicated MDM platforms, with reported command latency and disruptive update prompts.
• Employees cannot contact Rippling support directly; every issue routes through a company admin.
• Workflow errors during onboarding or offboarding can enter automated loops that require manual support intervention.

Rippling's automation depends on accurate HR records and correctly configured workflows.

What Users Say About Rippling IT

Sentiment varies by reviewer role: HR users skew more positive, while IT practitioners focus on device management and governance limits:

• HR-driven provisioning is the core value, and reviewers identify Rippling as an all-in-one contender for device management, SSO, and asset tracking.
• Practitioners running mixed fleets report it works, but dedicated MDM tools provide deeper device management.
• Initial backend setup is described as dense and easy to misconfigure without dedicated IT help.
• Some practitioners question whether the same team should manage people data and high-privilege access credentials.

User sentiment sourced from Capterra as of August 2026.

Rippling IT Pricing

• Quote-based modules: Identity, device management, and other IT capabilities are priced as separate per-employee add-ons, scoped through sales.

Rippling IT capabilities are priced as modular per-employee add-ons quoted through sales.

Best fit: Companies consolidating HR, payroll, and IT tooling in one move, where the event that creates the payroll record should also create accounts and ship a configured laptop.

Look for Rippling IT alternatives if: Security policy requires identity administration independent of the HR function, or you need best-of-breed device management.

8. SailPoint

SailPoint is an identity governance and administration (IGA) platform. Enterprises use it alongside an identity provider when they need deeper access certifications, lifecycle management, and role management than an IdP provides.

SailPoint Key Features

• Access certifications: Access certifications and role management across mixed platforms, the core of audit readiness.
• Machine identity requests: Access requests for non-human identities, announced August 13, 2026. This addresses service-account sprawl outside IdP governance.
• Just-in-time access: Zero-standing-privilege controls added in August 2026 reduce always-on entitlements.
• Separation of duties: SoD permission checks via custom user levels surface conflicting entitlements before auditors do.

These controls focus on access review, entitlement management, and governance rather than authentication.

SailPoint Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Governance depth built for Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) obligations that lighter IdP add-ons cannot certify against.
• Coverage now extends to machine identities and non-employee risk, two audit gaps.
• It complements the existing IdP, so adopting it forces no authentication migration.

Cons:

• Implementation requires extensive technical work, and IdentityIQ customization calls for Java expertise.
• Reporting and technical assistance draw repeated criticism from reviewers.
• An IdP is still required for authentication and paid for separately.

SailPoint adds governance depth while leaving sign-in with an existing identity provider.

What Users Say About SailPoint

Reviewers on G2 and Gartner Peer Insights evaluate SailPoint as a governance engine:

• Access certifications and role management across diverse platforms receive consistent praise.
• Governance-focused reviewers on Gartner Peer Insights rate SailPoint above Okta's governance product for certification depth.
• Implementation complexity recurs as the primary cost, with significant technical staffing required to run it well.
• Reviewers want better reporting and more responsive technical assistance.

User sentiment sourced from Gartner Peer Insights as of August 2026.

SailPoint Pricing

• Quote only: Identity Security Cloud and IdentityIQ are scoped by deployment size and module mix.

No per-user rates are published; SailPoint scopes Identity Security Cloud and IdentityIQ deals through sales. Verified August 2026.

Best fit: Audit-bound enterprises that will keep Okta or Entra ID for sign-in and need certification campaigns, SoD enforcement, and machine-identity governance layered on top.

Look for SailPoint alternatives if: A consultant-led, Java-heavy implementation is out of reach, or you have no audit-driven certification requirement.

9. CyberArk Workforce Identity

CyberArk Workforce Identity is an access management platform that layers SSO and adaptive MFA on top of the company's privileged access management (PAM) heritage. CyberArk is now part of Palo Alto Networks and is being folded into the Idira identity security platform.

CyberArk Workforce Identity Key Features

• Adaptive MFA: Machine-learned behavior analysis applies authentication factors selectively by risk score.
• PAM heritage: Credential vaulting and privileged session recording produce audit evidence that workforce IdPs cannot.
• App Gateway: Legacy on-premises applications get modern authentication without source-code changes.
• Secure Browser: Disables the browser's native password manager and adds cookie protection, password replacement, and continuous authentication, so browser-stored credentials stop being the weakest link in workforce sign-in.

The feature set combines workforce authentication with privileged-access controls and browser protection.

CyberArk Workforce Identity Pros and Cons

Pros:

• One platform spans human, machine, and agentic AI identity, with connectors across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid systems.
• Session recording and vaulting meet audit requirements, keeping regulated enterprises standardized on it.
• Reviewers give adaptive, risk-scored MFA higher marks than the platform's workflow tools.

Cons:

• Self-service access requests and approval workflows lag the dedicated workforce IdPs.
• Administration carries a steep learning curve, and upgrade projects can require professional services.
• The Palo Alto Networks integration and Idira repositioning leave roadmap questions for buyers who need workforce SSO more than PAM.

CyberArk fits PAM-led security programs rather than teams seeking a simpler workforce IdP.

What Users Say About CyberArk Workforce Identity

G2 and Gartner Peer Insights reviews describe a platform valued for compliance controls but difficult to administer:

• Reviewers single out context-aware MFA that adjusts factors based on learned behavior.
• Session recording and credential vaulting are important controls in regulated environments.
• Cost is a recurring complaint among reviewers.
• Features like Identity Flows and Secure Web Sessions demand deep documentation review before they pay off.

User sentiment sourced from Gartner Peer Insights as of August 2026.

CyberArk Workforce Identity Pricing

• Quote only: Workforce identity and privileged access bundles are sized per deployment.

No workforce identity or PAM bundle rates are published; sales scope deals.

Best fit: Organizations whose auditors require privileged session recording and credential vaulting, and who would consolidate workforce SSO into that platform instead of running a separate PAM vendor beside a lighter IdP.

Look for CyberArk Workforce Identity alternatives if: You want a straightforward SaaS workforce IdP, published pricing before a sales call, or roadmap certainty while the Idira consolidation plays out.

Where Siit Fits

Siit is the request layer used alongside whichever IAM platform you choose. Employees ask for app access or report a login problem through Slack-based IT support, and Siit routes the request, handles approvals, and records the trail. The identity platform continues to provide SSO, MFA, and governance.

Okta is a native Siit integration. From a workflow, a request side panel, or the IT Agent, Siit can reset an Okta password, suspend or activate a user, add or remove group membership, and assign apps, so an approved access request finishes without an admin opening the Okta console. 

Siit's Entra directory sync imports Microsoft Entra ID employee directory data into Siit's records. Across the wider stack, Siit connects to 500+ connectable apps.

For teams mid-migration between identity vendors, that separation matters: access requests keep flowing through one request channel while the backend changes. See the chat-based identity actions.